headermask image

header image

My article about media coverage of the Gaza campaign

Credit: ISRAELPRESS by Tomeriko/Flickr

“Since the start of the current Gaza campaign, the Israeli government and army have repeatedly said that they learned many lessons from the Second Lebanon War. Ostensibly, they are referring to the tactical and political breakdown outlined in the devastating postwar report issued by the Winograd Commission. But it seems that the government also learned a powerful lesson from Hezbollah — i.e., whoever controls the media wins the war.”

Click here to continue reading “Eyeless in Israel,” my opinion piece for the Forward.

UPDATE: Hmmm. It looks as though Haaretz’s Yossi Melman reads my blog.

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

5 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Thank you for that article. It’s important to point out that a society needs to know what it’s doing, especially when it’s a war of this nature. Ironically, while the Israeli authorities control the media on the home-front, images of the war are available outside of Israel.

    1. TM
    on January 9th, 2009 at 10:56 pm
  2. I think that the operation is a good idea (or rather, not as bad as the alternatives).

    Nevertheless, I agree it is not covered properly in the Israeli media. Not enough questions raised, not enough of the price discussed.

    2. Aviv
    on January 10th, 2009 at 12:55 am
  3. Yes Lisa, there are people on both sides of the border suffering.
    This is a tragedy. The overriding issue in the conflict is not of proportionality or collective punishment. It doesn’t matter what the relative numbers of casualties are. What matters is that there are thousands of rockets emanating from Gaza being launched by the elected government of that enclave. The inhabitants of Gaza must be held responsible for the decision to be governed by a group of terrorist thugs. Furthermore, as you know I am sure, Hamas has positioned its weapons directly in civilian areas so as to increase civilian casualties for propaganda purposes.

    This conflict is not about poverty, occupation or humiliation. This is a canard. The conflict is strictly about ideology. An ideology that at its heart desires the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. It has created a society that revels in death and martyrdom. I doubt that there will ever be an end to war between Israel and the Arabs in my life or the life of my children.

    It’s sad that Israel’s concern for the well-being of civilians
    is only viewed as weakness in the eyes of its enemies. Israel is in a death struggle in its fight with jihadist proxies of Iran on two fronts. This seems not to matter to you as much as the fact that more Arabs are dying than Jews are – for now. Your priorities are misplaced!

    Unfortunately, the world has a double standard where Jews are concerned. Too bad! I fear there will never be a solution to the worldwide jihad unless the world stands up with one voice to this attack on our civilization.

    AS – You left the same comment – what, four, five times? – on the thread following my article on the Forward site. Message received, over and out. One thing: your declaration has absolutely nothing to do with the points outlined in my piece; it’s a total non-sequitir. Sounds as though you need a platform: perhaps you should get your own blog. LG

    3. AS
    on January 10th, 2009 at 3:32 am
  4. Thanks for posting again Lisa, I wish that we heard more from Israelis like you, the British media seems keen on interviewing only those with hard-line views, which is misleading.

    The Israeli government’s position on allowing international and Israeli journalists/photographers into Gaza is very disappointing, but as we’ve seen over the past few years, it is the world’s ‘democracies’ that seem most keen to clamp down on reporters and, in particular, photographers.

    I guess the reason they are doing it is that if only local journalists/photographers are reporting then any reports can be (and are being) dismissed as either exaggerated or as being total lies. This would be harder to do if the reports came from international journalists, and almost impossible if the reports came from Israeli journalists. I’m sure that they would still try to discredit those reports, but it would make it much harder!

    So, in the short term it is a good tactic on behalf of the Israeli government/military, but in the long term they are doing irreparable damage to Israel’s reputation as the region’s only true democracy.

    I wish Israeli politicians would stop playing Hamas’ game, but it seems that politicians never learn. As I understand it, Hamas was becoming increasingly unpopular, so why not let that run its course? The next round of elections would have probably seen them ousted, and even if they refused to go, it would have removed any perceived legitimacy. The currently military action will only increase support for Hamas and other militant groups (in the same way that ‘Bloody Sunday’ was the PIRA’s best recruiting sergeant).

    The same thing happened in Yugoslavia, Milosevic was deeply unpopular and on his way out, then the west bombed Belgrade and his popularity increased dramatically. A Serbian friend of mine told me that the people thought that the west would help them get rid of Milosevic, they were totally shocked when Belgrade was bombed. As she said, “I hated that man [Milosevic], but when your country is attacked you have to support your government”.

    Having lost a number of friends and colleagues to terrorist attacks during the late eighties and early nineties (when the IRA were actively targeting military personnel), I totally understand Israeli concerns. It is not a pleasant thing to live in constant fear (even now, all these years later, I am still totally paranoid about things like unattended bags in public places), but Israel has one of the most technically advance military in the world, is there really no other way to stop the rockets than an all out assault? We are told that the offensive is intelligence lead and targeted, but if that were really the case then Israeli soldiers wouldn’t be dying in ‘friendly fire’ incidents. If the tanks were only shelling buildings with links to Hamas then they wouldn’t have killed and injured so many of their own soldiers.

    Keeping the international and Israeli media out of Gaza is a mistake, but then so is the current political/military strategy. Hamas needs to be stopped, but killing innocents is not the way to achieve that. Palestinians who see their children die at the hands of IDF airstrikes are going to be no less traumatised and enraged than Israelis who see their children die in suicide or rocket attacks. As a democracy, Israel should seek a more imaginative solution than simply perpetuating the killing and suffering and hatred, until that happens people on both ‘sides’ will continue to die.

    I wish you well Lisa, stay safe and keep writing!

    4. Nicola
    on January 10th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
  5. Hear, hear, Lisa.

    Again kindly allow me to speak from the perspective of the “innocent bystander reading about all of this,” since I think you’ve got a considerable readership from outside Israel for whom your posts are doing a world of good.

    Lookit, problem for the IDF and Jerusalem permitting Al-Jazeera to do most of the dispatching from inside the Strip for now is that the bulk of the demystification of the defensive/offensive falls on the not always capable shoulders of either Diaspora Jews, Diaspora Israelis, or Friends of Israel.

    There might be some kind of grand strategy in mind on the part of the Israeli government in permitting this, but I can’t see it for now. Too “conspiracy-esque” for my blood, though I’m not going to say it’s beyond the capabilities of the IDF.

    Left to fend for ourselves without the required tools or information, supporters of Israel (including myself and many others here in Europe) who genuinely believe in Her mission and right to exist are left groping at straws or goobering our sometimes bland shibboleths which can be instantly debunked (rightly or wrongly) by the combined iron fist of the one-sided Beeb, CNN, France 24, Reuters, etc.

    So what to do in a situation like this?

    Personally, I find it increasingly hard to sally forth with the same series of staid justifications — I consider myself relatively well-informed as to the causes and consequences of this conflict, having tracked it from its origins — when all the while the Beeb’s got these flashy diagrams and up-to-the-minute tickers about how many civilian casualties there’ve already been on the Gaza side…which the BBC will then use to clobber IL for its “disproportionate” use of force against the Hamas bullies.

    Not only is this tiring, but it’s akin to a dog chasing its tail.

    So I side with you fully that something major, massive, and transformational needs to be done ASAP about the disproportionate (to kill a phrase!) use of the media down there. It’ll give us — up here — the necessary ammunition (like my friend in Israel says) to show how “not everything is what is seems to be…at all times.”

    Lastly, I side completely with one of your recent commenters at your previous masterful post…your perspective will change dramatically, Lisa, if — G.od forbid — Israeli civilians become embroiled as victims in places as distant as Tel Aviv. If the proverbial excrement starts hitting the fan, optics on this conflict by then will have been blown the hell wide open, perhaps causing the player-hating globe to cease spanking Israel across the behind for its so-called “incorrigible ways.” Full stop.

    I personally lived in Tel Aviv for two years back in the late ’90s. Let me tell you I never *once* felt I was living in the Israel of Sderot, Be’er Sheva, Netivot, or even Jerusalem for that matter, which likely explains the massive Jewish Israeli turnout for the protest rally from last weekend, making it SEEM as though a significant number of Jewish Israelis are against this war. having lived in IL, I now understand how this can happen, because Gaza often seems like a galaxy away.

    Off to read some of the comments on the Forward’s site.

    You rock.

    5. Adam Daniel Mezei
    on January 11th, 2009 at 5:57 am

One Trackback

  1. By In Israel during the siege of Gaza | Toban Black on January 21, 2009 at 4:39 pm

    [...] In an article in Forward (”The Jewish Daily”), Lisa has criticized mainstream Israeli media coverage of the Gaza campaign. [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*