headermask image

header image

From Darfur to the kibbutz

Before
Davide and I went to interview the refugees from Darfur, we were told that we
must neither photograph them nor publish their surnames. If we violated those
ground rules, we would  “…be responsible
for endangering the lives of their relatives in Sudan,” warned a UN refugee
representative who looks after the interests of the refugees from Darfur in
Israel.

Israel and
Sudan are officially “enemies,” which makes the status of the 300 or so
Darfur refugees in Israel very complex, because Israeli law does not permit the
granting of asylum to citizens of enemy states.  So when those refugees surrendered themselves to the Israeli
authorities after crossing the border from Egypt, they were detained and jailed
under the Law to Prevent Infiltration [from enemy states].  The stories of those jailed refugees, who
had seen their families murdered and / or experienced horrible torture at the
hands of the Janjaweed, were
widely and sympathetically covered by the Israeli media, and many Israelis
responded with horror: Given the all-too-fresh memory of what happened to the
Jewish people during the Second World War, how could Israel fail to grant
asylum to refugees fleeing genocide?  

Several
Israeli NGO’s, under the umbrella of the Committee for Advancement of
Refugees from Darfur
(CARD), are calling on the Israeli government to find
a humane solution.  Last year the
Immigrant Workers’ Hotline and the Refugee Rights Legal Clinic at Tel Aviv
University successfully petitioned the Supreme Court for a temporary review
mechanism; as a result, the courts can now grant permission, on an individual
basis and with the agreement of the Ministry of Defence, for Darfur refugees to
be temporarily settled on host kibbutzim. We went to visit five of those
recently released men at Kibbutz Maagan Michael, near Haifa.

Their names
are Ali, Hussein, Hassan, Guzuli and Jama, and their ages range from 26 to 32.
They share two Spartan rooms furnished with single beds and a table. There is a
modest kitchenette outside each of the rooms, and a bathroom. Everything was
spotlessly clean, but there were none of the little luxuries that most of we spoiled
westerners consider near-necessities – no books, no portable stereo, no CD’s.
The men work in the kibbutz factories and they are proscribed by law from
leaving the kibbutz without written permission. But they have no complaints
about kibbutz life, given what they went through over the previous few years.
All spoke warmly of the reception they had received at the kibbutz. They had
been assigned adoptive families that hosted them for coffee and cake on Friday
afternoons, before the Sabbath meal in the dining hall; the families made sure
their needs were taken care of and offered what one of the men called
“psychological comfort.”

We sat on
the beds and started the interview, but Hassan interrupted politely. What would
we like to drink? They served us mineral water and Sprite, and insisted we
accept pieces of homemade strawberry shortcake, baked by one of the adoptive
families. Then they told us their stories.

Ali (32)
used to be a farmer. He last saw his wife and newborn baby the day after a
Janjaweed militia attacked his village three-and-a-half years ago. They killed 40 of his family members in
one day. He, his wife and baby managed to escape to another village, but when
Ali went out to collect some thatch to build them a shelter he was ambushed by
some Janjaweed and taken to one of their camps. There he was kept in a 2 metre
by 2 metre container for three days, without food. Every few minutes, his
captors put a cobra in the container and then removed it, in a primitive game
of Russian roulette. Released on condition that he become an informant, Ali
managed to escape and make his way to Egypt. That dangerous journey took nearly
two months, and it took another six months to receive UN refugee status in
Egypt. Not that it helped much. According to Egyptian law he was forbidden to work,
and the local UN office told him that only families were eligible for food aid.

But he had
to eat, so Ali worked illegally, was caught and jailed for one week. When he
was released, the police warned him that he would be deported to Sudan if
caught working again. Meanwhile, his only two friends had received refuge in
the USA and Australia. “I was starving, I was totally alone and I felt
helpless,” said Ali. He had never heard of Israel, but someone told him that it
was a democracy and he should try his luck there. So he did. He spent a total
of 17 months in various Israeli jails before a judge agreed to his release. He
does not know whether his wife and child are alive or dead.

Hussein
(29) explained that he first heard of Israel during the two years he worked
(illegally) in the Sinai. He met many Israeli tourists there, he said, and
formed a positive impression of the country through those interactions. He
smiled and spoke smoothly when he spoke of the time he spent in the Sinai, but
as soon as he started telling us about what happened to him in Darfur, Hussein
developed a pronounced stutter. And the second he finished recounting his
ordeal, he quietly left the room and went outside to smoke a cigarette.

Like Ali,
Hussein was a subsistence farmer. He was captured by the Janjaweed during a
shootout with rebel fighters, accused of being a rebel and jailed for two
weeks. His captors fed him only bread. “It did something to my stomach,” said
Hussein. After Hussein was released, his uncle took him for the surgery
necessary to unblock his digestive system, then smuggled him to Egypt “because
we have tribesmen there.” But the tribesmen were nowhere to be found, and
Hussein, too, found himself a refugee denied UN aid and forbidden to work. He
stayed in Egypt for four years, but realized that he would never be granted
permanent status and would always have to work illegally for a bare living. The
Egyptians, he said, regularly humiliated him in everyday interactions.

So in May
of 2005 he paid a Bedouin to smuggle him into Israel, where he was promptly
detained by a patrol of border police. “How did they treat you?” we asked.
“Great!” answered Hussein. “They took care me – gave me food, clothes and
blankets. One of the officers spoke to me in Arabic. I wish I could have stayed
longer with the army.”

All the men
experienced different types of trauma, torture and loss in Sudan, but their
stories about Egypt are remarkably similar: the Catch-22 of being
simultaneously forbidden to work and denied refugee aid; humiliation at the
hands of the Egyptians; the realization that they could not stay there
indefinitely. I asked if they were worried about being perceived by the Arab
world as traitors for saying positive things about Israel to journalists. “We
don’t have any confidence in the Arab world after the way the Egyptians treated
us,” one responded, as the others nodded in agreement. “And the Arab world
didn’t do anything to stop the Janjaweed from perpetrating genocide on our
people.”

Davide
asked if they were learning to speak Hebrew. A little, they answered, bashfully
demonstrating their small vocabulary. Then Hussein told us that a 76 year-old
kibbutz woman named Jeanine volunteered to teach them Hebrew for two hours a
week.

Of course
we wanted to meet her. So I took Jeanine’s number from Hussein and called her,
offering to come to her home because I assumed that a 76 year-old woman would be
rather frail. “I’ll come to you,” she said, decisively.

Five
minutes later a human energizer bunny with fluffy, short white hair and
twinkling blue eyes, wearing jeans and a fleece jacket, came bounding into the
room. She greeted us all, plonked herself on one of the beds, waved away the
proffered slice of strawberry short cake (“I ate too much today”) and looked at
me and Davide expectantly.

I asked if
she would like to speak in English or Hebrew, with me translating. “I speak
only French and Hebrew,” she said, “So you will have to translate.”

It turned
out that Jeanine had immigrated to Israel in 1949 from Tunisia, and that she
had been a schoolteacher for 35 years. She referred to the men from Darfur as
“the boys.”

“Language,”
she said emphatically, “Is crucial. If the boys want to buy a ticket for the
train, how will they manage without Hebrew? The person who sells the ticket
doesn’t speak English. When I heard that the boys were working full time in the
factories, I knew they wouldn’t have time for ulpan classes. So I volunteered
to teach them. And together we are discovering that there are many similarities
between Arabic and Hebrew. Isn’t that right, boys?”

The five
men looked at her affectionately and nodded as they responded in unison, like
obedient schoolboys, “That’s right, Jeanine.”

“But if
you’re from Tunisia, don’t you know Arabic?” I asked.

“Ah,” she
said, with a mischievous smile, “You don’t know what a French colonial
education is like. I was raised to speak only pure, proper French. My parents
spoke Arabic to one another when they didn’t want me to understand what they
were saying. So no, I don’t speak Arabic.”

Then she
turned to Davide and said, in halting Italian, “My father’s family came to
Tunisia from Livorno,
about 300 years ago.”

We asked
why the kibbutz had decided to accept refugees from Darfur.

Jeanine
looked at me sternly. “Do you know what happened at the Evian Conference in
1938?” she asked. “When all the countries gathered to try to find a solution
for the Jews of Germany and Austria but no-one was willing to give them
refuge?”

Yes, I
answered, of course.

“So that’s
why,” answered Jeanine. “We knew that we had a moral obligation, after what happened
to us.”

Did people
mention that at the meeting? I asked.

“No,” said
Jeanine. “They didn’t have to. It was understood.”

As we were
driving away from the kibbutz, I asked Davide if he planned to use Jeanine’s
quote about the Evian Conference in his article. “Of course,” he said.

“Because
the paper will probably get letters from the knee-jerk anti-Israel crowd, you
know,” I said, “Accusing you of being biased toward Israel for writing about the Darfur refugees while the Palestinian refugee issue is still unresolved.”

“Maybe,” he
said. “But I don’t think they can really say that, because I already wrote about the gay
Palestinians
who come to Israel for refuge, and what a hard time they
have.” (more on that subject here).

Later I
wrote an email about Jeanine to Jill,
who’s living in London now. In her response she wrote: “O
h, that's what
I miss about Israel:  the stories, the people, that unique and pure goodness of eccentric old ladies that sometimes shines out through all the crap.”

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

22 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. Fantastic story!! This is just great stuff.
    One question though: You keep mentioning Somalia in the story. I was under the impression that Darfur was in Sudan and unless the refugees in the story transited through Somalia at some point, I'm guessing maybe this is an oversight?

    1. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  2. VB, you are so polite!
    I wrote Somalia instead of Sudan because – well, because I was blogging at 3 a.m. Thanks for saving me.
    And I'm so glad you like the story.

    2. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  3. Great story indeed and very moving as well.
    I can't get over the fact that horrors like this still happen nowadays, and no country is doing anything about it. You can only feel but helpless faced to these horrendous stories.

    3. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  4. i have heard of ms jeanine.. as a grandson of a sudanese lady i am particularly proud hehe :)

    4. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  5. Great piece. I have a question though; Israel has ratified the 1951 UN Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. How come its obligations under this treaty don't trump the national law about enemy infiltration? I doubt if the convention allows refugees to be jailed.

    5. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  6. Hey Eamon -
    I really don't know the answer to your question about the apparent contradiction between the 1951 UN Convention and the Israeli Law of Infiltration. As far as I understood, the Darfur refugees were jailed not as a punitive measure, but simply because the authorities didn't know what to do with them in the absence of legal provisions.
    If anyone knows the answer to Eamon's question, now's the time to de-lurk (maybe that person with the Harvard Law School IP address? ;) ).

    6. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  7. In refusing refugee status on the basis that the Sudanese are nationals of an enemy state, Israel is in breach of the Geneva Refugee Convention. When the convention was agreed, in 1951, Israel argued for the inclusion of a provision that no one could be refused refugee status on the basis that s/he was the national of an enemy state – because of the German Jews refused asylum during the Second World War on this basis.
    So, in answer to Eamon's question, the two have not been reconciled. This is particularly disturbing given the fact that Israel herself argued for inclusion of the provision, and now ignores it, a fact upon which Israeli judiciary has commented – see http://olahadasha.typepad.com/ola_hadasha/2006/12/you_shall_not_w.html
    Leila

    7. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  8. The part I found the most interesting (besides the hospitality part) was the “Heard about Israel” wording Lisa used in the post.
    Lisa, maybe you can elaborate about this a bit. But did these people never hear of Israel before their ordeals? As in, they had no clue it existed?
    Another question that comes to mind (and forgive my ignorance here): Are these folks muslim? (I am assuming they are based on their first names, and the fact they come from Sudan). And if so, how does their faith/religion practices play out with life at a Kibbutz?
    (Inquiring minds want to know!)

    8. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  9. Hey Mr. Inquiring Mind -
    One of the five guys was a university student in Khartoum before he was arrested and tortured for alleged political activity, and he had heard of Israel. But the other four were simple subsistence farmers from remote, traditional villages – and they all said that they had never heard of Israel before their arrival in Egypt.
    And yes, they're all Muslims – they're black Africans, whereas the Janjaweed are Arabs, although they all speak Arabic and practice the same religion. I think we asked them about whether they practiced their religion on the kibbutz, which is totally secular, and they sort of brushed the question aside with a response like “no problem.” I'm sure no-one would interfere with them practicing their religion. The kibbutz might serve pork in the dining hall, but you kind of have to go out of your way to find non-kosher beef in Israel, and since Muslims consider kosher meat hallal (I remember that little factoid from Sadat's visit to Israel), I guess food is not a problem.

    9. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  10. Thank you for the clarifications.
    Little factoids like that always seem to make my day, and also go to show that human beings are, in the end, human beings. There is no intrinsic hatred for Jews in Muslims (at least not through their religion itself). When you take out propaganda, brainwashing and all that from the equation (as seems to be the case with these subsistence farmers), you find human beings who could care less if you're a Jew or a Muslim as long as you treat them with dignity, compassion and hospitality.

    10. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  11. Maagan Michael is a wonderful place to be. I'm in the ulpan there.
    I wish Ali and Hussain all the best and a bright future.

    11. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  12. Hi Lisa,
    If you're interested, here's a link to an interview with a Canadian-Sudanese human rights activist who also heads the Sudanese-Israeli Friendship Association. She makes a couple of great points.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54yjdiZZvFA
    Regards,
    Nizo

    12. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  13. Hey Nizo -
    Thanks so much for reminding me of that fascinating interview. I've seen it several times, and each time I'm impressed – that is one strong, intelligent woman.
    Unfortunately a lot of people are likely to disregard her message – because she is a woman, because she is black, because she is a bit strident, and because the interview was translated by MEMRI. Sad, huh?

    13. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  14. What's the problem with MEMRI? I read it was a Mossad operation, but is that even vaguely correct?

    14. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  15. MEMRI a Mossad operation??? Uh, no. It's an NGO that distributes translations of articles and television clips from the Middle Eastern media (Arabic and Persian).
    Some people have claimed that MEMRI selects articles and clips that promote a negative image of Iran and the Arab world. Brian Whittaker wrote a piece for the Guardian that sums up that contention – here. I think MEMRI probably does have an agenda, but the fact is that they do translate articles and interviews from mainstream ME media outlets like Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera, so it's not as if they're scratching around for some marginal extremist material. On the other hand, they may be neglecting the wider picture.
    Perhaps Mid East bloggers are filling that information gap.

    15. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  16. wow – what an interview! I couldn't figure out exactly when it took place, and who aired it. Any indications ?
    Lisa, thanks for the nice post!
    Moku Yobi

    16. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  17. Hi MY -
    The interview was for an Italian newspaper. I'm glad you enjoyed the piece.

    17. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  18. “Before Davide and I went to interview the refugees from Darfur, we were told that we must neither photograph them nor publish their surnames.”
    But that is CENSORSHIP!
    Of course there is good reason for the censorship, but nonetheless it is censorship.
    There were good reasons to employ censorship standards during the 2006 summer war that you lost. It seems like too many Israeli Journalists (not you but I am thinking of those who work for international news outlets like Reuters) choose their careers over their patriotism to Israel.
    During the next war, here is what Israel's censorship policy should be. No International press. Possible exceptions should be made for International news agencies who are likely to portray your side favorably and to reward past good reporting. Any bad reports and the Israel Government should not hesitate in revoking their permission to be there. Second on all media including domestic media news articles and videos about the war should go first through a government agency to make sure that the information promotes the war effort. This should only be done regarding war reporting during the war.
    Censorship even in relatively free societies is sometimes necessary and it is very necessary in regards to war and national security.
    Actually in regards to the international press during war or not, only occasionally give them access to your country and your leaders. Make access a precious commodity that would easily be revoked if the report done on you is unfavorable. Only give it to certain reporters who would then see it in their benefit to give you favorable reports, for they would know they would otherwise lose the access and some other reporter would get it and benefit from it.

    18. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  19. No Max, it is not censorship. A non-Israeli representative of an NGO – not an Israeli government body – told us that if we published the photos and surnames of the refugees we would be endangering the lives of their families in Sudan. We *chose* not to publish the information because doing so would have been unethical – and from a pragmatic point of view, the information added no value to the story.
    There is a vast difference between self-censorship in order to protect the lives of innocents, and government-imposed censorship in order to promote a non-democratic agenda.

    19. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  20. Well certainly domestic news should never be censored. That is news regarding local, domestic affairs.
    But when it comes to war, when it comes to national security, well that is a totally different matter. There the news needs to be censored in a way that helps Israel interests and promotes the war effort. There the government does have a role to play.
    And foreign journalists never have a RIGHT to report from Israel. The most effective way to obtain positive press is actually to limit their access to Israel and Israeli leaders. Then when an individual foreign journalist is granted access to Israel and its leaders that journalist will report favorably knowing that such access can be denied in the future and given instead to a competitor.
    As a journalist yourself I hope you will advocate for these measures.

    20. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  21. You mean, so that the journalist can then run off and claim that the Israeli government practices censorship and that if they are doing that then they must have something serious to hide?
    And then the same journalist gets a story from another, maybe very biased and anti-Israeli source to “prove” that Israel is the root of all evil and that they do have something to hide.
    And that helps how?

    21. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  22. Max, I usually play it nice, but your comments almost gave me a brain haemorrhage. Since when is voluntarily protecting the persecuted from, well, further persecution considered censorship??
    And that crap about foreign journalists in Israel – when, who, where?

    22. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*