headermask image

header image

Putting things in perspective


                                                                   Sebastian Scheiner/AP

The image above caused a huge storm of outrage in the Arab blogosphere. Huge. You wouldn't believe how huge. The widely-read Gulf-based Palestinian blogger who was the first to post it received so much traffic that he had to move the photo to another server. Many others, including several I know personally, posted it and expressed their disgust. Israeli children taught to hate! Lebanese children are dying and they're happy! They're no better than… (fill in the blank, I don't want to go there).

Below is the story behind the photo – from the source.

I phoned Sebastian Scheiner, the Israeli photojournalist who took the photo for Associated Press (AP), explained that the image had given a really terrible impression and asked for the context. He sketched it out quickly and fluidly, but asked me not to quote him. So I spoke with Shelly Paz, a Yedioth Ahronoth reporter who was also at the scene and agreed immediately to go on record. She was quite shocked to learn how badly the photo had been misinterpreted and misrepresented; and she told me the same story Sebastian did, but with more details and nuance.

The little girls shown drawing with felt markers on the tank missiles are residents of Kiryat Shmona, which is right on the border with Lebanon. And when I say “on the border,” I'm not kidding; there's little more space between their town and Southern Lebanon than there is between the back gardens of neighbouring houses in a wealthy American suburb.

No, how close is it really?

Well, there's a famous story in Israel, from the time when the Israeli army occupied Southern Lebanon: a group of soldiers stationed inside southern Lebanon used their mobile phones to order pizza from Kiryat Shmona and have it delivered to the fence that separates the two countries.

Anyway.

Kiryat Shmona has been under constant bombardment from South Lebanon since the first day of the conflict. It was a ghost town, explained Shelly. There was not a single person on the streets and all the businesses were closed. The residents who had friends, family or money for alternate housing out of missile range had left, leaving behind the few who had neither the funds nor connections that would allow them to escape the missiles crashing and booming on their town day and night. The noise was terrifying, people were dying outside, the kids were scared out of their minds and they had been told over and over that some man named Nasrallah was responsible for their having to cower underground for days on end.

On the day that photo was taken, the girls had emerged from the underground bomb shelters for the first time in five days. A new army unit had just arrived in the town and was preparing to shell the area across the border. The unit attracted the attention of twelve photojournalists – Israeli and foreign. The girls and their families gathered around to check out the big attraction in the small town – foreigners. They were relieved and probably a little giddy at being outside in the fresh air for the first time in days. They were probably happy to talk to people. And they enjoyed the attention of the photographers.

Apparently one or some of the parents wrote messages in Hebrew and English on the tank shells to Nasrallah. “To Nasrallah with love,” they wrote to the man whose name was for them a devilish image on television – the man who mockingly told Israelis, via speeches that were broadcast on Al Manar and Israeli television, that Hezbollah was preparing to launch even more missiles at them. That he was happy they were suffering.

The photograpers gathered around. Twelve of them. Do you know how many that is? It's a lot. And they were all simultaneously leaning in with their long camera lenses, clicking the shutter over and over. The parents handed the markers to the kids and they drew little Israeli flags on the shells. Photographers look for striking images, and what is more striking than pretty, innocent little girls contrasted with the ugliness of war? The camera shutters clicked away, and I guess those kids must have felt like stars, especially since the diversion came after they'd been alternately bored and terrified as they waited out the shelling in their bomb shelters.

Shelly emphasized several times that none of the parents or children had expressed any hatred toward the Lebanese people. No-one expressed any satisfaction at knowing that Lebanese were dying – just as Israelis are dying. Their messages were directed at Nasrallah. None of those people was detached or wise enough to think: “Hang on, tank shell equals death of human beings.” They were thinking, tank shell equals stopping the missiles that land on my house. Tank shells will stop that man with the turban from threatening to kill us.

And besides, none of those children had seen images of dead people – either Israeli or Lebanese. Israeli television doesn't broadcast them, nor do the newspapers print them. Even when there were suicide bombings in Israel several times a week for months, none of the Israeli media published gory photos of dead or wounded people. It's a red line in Israel. Do not show dead, bleeding, torn up bodies because the families of the dead will suffer and children will have nightmares. And because it is just in bad taste to use suffering for propaganda purposes.

Those kids had seen news footage of destroyed buildings and infrastructure, but not of the human toll. They had heard over and over that the air force was destroying the buildings that belonged to Hezbollah, the organization responsible for shelling their town and threatening their lives. How many small children would be able to make the connection between tank shells and dead people on their own? How many human beings are able to detach from their own suffering and emotional stress and think about that of the other side? Not many, I suspect.

So, perhaps the parents were not wise when they encouraged their children to doodle on the tank shells. They were letting off a little steam after being cooped up – afraid, angry and isolated – for days. Sometimes people do silly things when they are under emotional stress. Especially when they fail to understand how their childish, empty gesture might be interpreted.

I've been thinking for the last two days about this photo and the storm of reaction it set off.  I worry about the climate of hate that would lead people to look at it and automatically assume the absolute worst – and then use the photo to dehumanize and victimize. I wonder why so many people seem to take satisfaction in believing that little Israeli girls with felt markers in their hands – not weapons, but felt markers -  are evil, or spawned by an evil society. I wonder how those people would feel if Israelis were to look at a photo of a Palestinian child wearing a mock suicide belt in a Hamas demonstration and conclude that all Palestinians – nay, all Arabs – are evil.

And I wonder why it is so difficult to think a little, to get it into our heads that television news and photojournalism manipulate our thoughts and emotions.

Links to anti-Israel websites with that photo placed prominently next to the image of a dead Lebanese child have been sent to me several times. Someone has been rushing around the Israeli blogosphere, leaving the link to one particularly abhorrent site in the comments boxes. And it makes me really sad that the emotional climate has
deteriorated to this point.

The moderates of the Middle East are locked in a battle with the extremists. And look what they did to the moderates. Without blinking, without thinking, we fell victim to the classic “divide and conquer”  technique. We work hard for months and years to build connections, develop our societies, educate ourselves, promote democracy and free speech… And they destroy it all, in less than a week. And we let them.

(Comments are now closed)

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

119 Comments so far (Add 1 more)

  1. This is terrible of the media, how can they circulate this picture and make the children look bad? I hope people take time to think before they judge.

    1. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  2. Excellent article which is already being linked to in discussions at UK sites like Harry's Place.
    In Britain and America there must still be large numbers of people alive who worked in munitions factories in WW2 and customarily wrote similarly cheerful messages on the bombs that killed one and a half million German and Japanese civilians.
    In Israel in 2006 a couple of small children are egged on by some idiotic and irresponsible adults and a small shit-storm erupts.
    Moral progress or just another example of the double standard always applied to Israel?

    2. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  3. “…who worked in munitions factories in WW2 and customarily wrote similarly cheerful messages on the bombs that killed one and a half million German and Japanese civilians”.
    And that makes it RIGHT? God help us all if one generation's banal evil can be used to justify another's. On that basis, the bombing of the King David hotel is perfect justification for September 11th.

    3. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  4. Geoffrey Transom that generation you refer to has the undying respect of a grateful nation. We call them our Greatest Generation.

    4. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  5. That's your definition of evil — scribbling something on a bomb (which, if it matters, will never be read by its target)? Yes, I think it was unwise (in a bunch of ways) to let this happen, but on the scale of things happening today, it's very, very minor.

    5. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  6. What a well written explanation! Thank you for the glimpse into the reality for families living in Kiryat Shmonah.

    6. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  7. Storm in a tea-cup. These girls have healthy instincts.
    What bothered me more is the spelling mistake in Hebrew. Girls this age should know their spelling better…

    7. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  8. Thanks for the article. I live in Israel and was completely horrified but not surprised by the picture. I consider myself fairly media savvy, but the tastelessness of that juxtaposition was appalling. Unfortunately, I more or less assumed much what you described, but that doesn't make it that much less disturbing for me: children treating missiles as saviours is a worry to me. Writing messages indicates that they see them as being targeted at PEOPLE (albeit Hezbollah) rather than installations (such as Katyusha launchers). On the other hand, Jews write messages and stick them in the Western Wall, so maybe it was more like: May the force be with this missile and help it hit its target. (I still find it distasteful).
    I can actually understand Lebanese who are being hit by those missiles misinterpreting the picture and I appreciate your efforts to somewhat straighten the record.
    The MOST disturbing aspect of this whole thing is the Israeli media's efforts to underplay or ignore the Lebanese fatalities. It's not just a matter of not showing the bodies. The Yediot and Maariv dailies had NO mention today of the Lebanese killed yesterday. Channel One news opened by listing the figures of the dead on both sides, but then made no further mention of the Lebanese casualties (and referred to the refugees only from an Israeli strategic perspective). Haaretz newspaper has been much more responsible and evenhanded (in fact far more so than most foreign press is vis a vis Israel, I think) and Channel 10's coverage is a little better than the others.
    I'm not sure Israeli media is any different to, say, the US during the Iraqi campaigns. But is that a model we want to follow?
    Bottom line: even if the pic was misinterpreted by the Lebanese viewers, based on a dehumanization of the Israeli victims, it still represents a general dehumanization of the Lebanese victims through the total silence about their plight.

    8. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  9. “The MOST disturbing aspect of this whole thing is the Israeli media's efforts to underplay or ignore the Lebanese fatalities.”
    Considdering that 95% of the world is overplaying the Lebanese fatalities and following the narrative that Israel is being disproportionate and even targetting innocent civilians, I don't think you need to worry if the Israeli media concentrates on the operations and Israeli casualties.

    9. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  10. Thanks for the explanation. I still believe that the timing of the publication was miserable.
    No-War button

    10. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  11. All Israelis and Jews should be grateful that you took the time to get to the bottom of this story. One could only wish that your post would get the same number of hits as those trying to make us out to be barbarians. However, this is very unlikely and a lot of damage has already and will continue to be done. Just like the al Dura video, people who want to believe the worst will eat it up.
    Regarding your point of how Israeli media does not show gory photos of dead people, I can tell you as one who reads the Arabic media on a daily basis that this is certainly not the case there. Most of the Arabic sites I've seen have been showing graphic photos of wounded and dead children. I'm still shocked every time I encounter this.
    A perusal this morning of the Arabic media turned up Al Jazeera calling the city of Karmiel a mustawtana or a colony and disgusting caricatures published in Al Watan (Qatar) and the London-based Al Quds Al Arabi. See:
    http://www.al-watan.com/data/20060720/index.asp?page=cartoon.htm
    and
    http://www.alquds.co.uk/index.asp?fname=2006\07\07-20\xa42.htm&storytitle=ffالحريري%20وقلب%20الأولوياتfff.
    Thank God there are people like you to counter those who poison the minds of millions with hate.
    Bravo aleki habibti
    Al

    11. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  12. Lisa,
    Thanks for the information putting this picture in context. My blog is not about this war or political stuff, in general. But, I will definitely link to your post here as this picture is making the rounds QUICKLY.
    Peace,
    Brian

    12. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  13. Thanks Lisa for doing the detective work and getting a confirmation of what some of us knew. Stuff like that doesn't surprise me anymore.

    13. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  14. Hi Lisa,
    Thanks again for the inside scoop. Now understand my great disdain for the MSM.
    BTW – I noticed that the “Free Alaa” courner of your blog site is gone. Is he free?
    TTFN,
    Bill

    14. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  15. Hi Bill,
    Yup, Alaa is free.
    Lisa

    15. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  16. Lisa,
    Thank you for giving us the other side story about this photo .. I admit that when I first saw it I felt upset and commented that this was an insult to humanity .. of course assuming the worst from what was already written and reaffirmed on many blogs
    During this emotionally stressful time; you can only imagine that the worst will be assumed and expected .. we all hate what is going on at the moment and the whole conflict is no one's best interest ..
    I came across your blog from a comment you left on Tololy's Box .. and I decided to accept the invitation and visit your blog to get your perspective …
    My blog is of a social nature and I never talk about politics .. and to tell you the truth; I am going to keep it this way .. but I decided to leave you a comment here because I felt that I fell in the trap and did not think before I judged and did not even think that there might be another story behind the photo ..
    Regardless of which story is right .. it is irrelevant now .. the damage is already done … but thank you for taking the time to investigate and clarify

    16. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  17. I'm still convinced that anybody who lets kids near live shells and eggs them on to do that – regardless why – is not correct in their minds. Kids are kids, they still can't always distinguish what's right from what's wrong, so it's not their fault.
    “None of those people was detached or wise enough to think: 'Hang on, tank shell equals death of human beings.' “
    Well duh, tank shells don't mean an extra ride on the ferris wheel, do they..
    I seriously hope you wouldn't let your kids do that..

    17. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  18. Sphinx, I did write that those parents acted unwisely. Before judging them, though, I invite you to spend 5 days and nights in a bomb shelter during a constant bombardment, without anything to amuse you, limited food and no air conditiong in the height of summer. Then tell me how you feel.

    18. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  19. The parents DIDN'T act unwisely.
    The ones who acted unwisely were the photojournalists who took the photos and the military who didn't confiscate the photojournalists' cameras once they did.

    19. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  20. Lisa, I think there are many Lebanese bloggers telling you (not you personally…) how they feel.

    20. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  21. Actually Lebanese can say you how they feel.

    21. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  22. well, i'm a lebanese, and when i saw the picture, my mind drifted to only one place:the kids don't know what's really happening around them, they are having fun..kids don't see things from the same perspective as we grown-ups see it. i didn't think those kids were evil!! i didn't think any of this bad shit,and defenetly i didn't let the media manipulate and orient my thought.Kids are kids,they are the same all around the world, they start changing when they grow up.
    In addition, the media is a worlwide propaganda, and everybody knows that. it tries to manipulate our minds, it shows us an image that it wants us to see and believe. Too bad some people believe what they (make them) see.

    22. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  23. They teach their children to become suicide bombers and then complain when Israeli kids write messages on bombs.
    What the children are doing is a perfectly healthy response to the situation they find themselves in. Perhaps people not in that situation wouldn't understand, it is kind of like black humor in that respect, but given the situation they face it is a way for them to regain some control at least psychologically.
    Writing messages on bombs is a tradition that goes way back. US soldiers used to do that in WWII.
    Outrage about this seems so “Politically Correct” when the truth is that this is war. Of course during war you teach your children to hate the enemy. You also make up names for your enemy like Americans did for the Japs.
    Take no mind of those who would criticize such a picture. They were your enemy to begin with. Just remember, you can't win a “politically correct” war so don't fall into the trap of trying to do so.

    23. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  24. you see Lisa, as the comment above shows so nicely again:
    I wonder how those people would feel if Israelis were to look at a photo of a Palestinian child wearing a mock suicide belt in a Hamas demonstration and conclude that all Palestinians – nay, all Arabs – are evil.
    this has happened in the past and is happening. so why should the other side be different…

    24. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  25. Yes, thank you for responding to that comment. You are right, of course.

    25. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  26. You are exactly right… We watch the world news as the Islamists parade their children around holding “Death to Israel” signs, dress their children up as suicide bombers, indoctrinate their children in the religion of hatred that pushes them to want to kill Israelis, and yet we act like it is an atrocity when the civilized people of Israel have had enough and retaliate against the savages…
    This is a double standard, and it disgusts me.
    If the Islamists wish to glorify their terrorist savages, then why should anyone be shocked when the victims of these terrorists see glory in the death of their antagonists?
    I share their sentiment. Death to Nasrallah, and maybe someday there can be peace in the Middle-East.

    26. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  27. first of all, not all arabs teach their kids to become suicide bombers!and not all arabs are islamists! only a minority does and is! BUT THEN AGAIN u should know that hatred and ignorance of 'the other' is the SAME evrywhere. but it is not justified. i understand that these kids were most probably traumatised from staying 5days underground, but for the least they were safe. and when u think that war is about death, safety is the most important attribute.
    i blame the parents, i blame the media … but i do not tolerate or justify such an attitude.
    Between 'us and them', generations of hatred and ignorance are expanding.
    there is no religion, no law, no interests, no conviction, no faith… there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING that justifies the atrocity of war.
    i know it has been said a million times before and yet since humans unfortunetly are very much capable of inhumanity i will say it again:
    war is about the killing and the destruction of lives. whatever “cause” is linked to it.
    i blame a whole life view that puts personel interests and convictions over human value no matter what!
    WAKE UP!
    (from Lebanon)

    27. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  28. A war can be fought to stop the killing.
    Breaking point has been reached, and it is now a war. Hopefully Israel will not stop until Hezbollah no longer have the ability to kill us – when that happens the war will be over.

    28. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  29. I think the reluctance to publish pictures of the victims of war is an error – of course there are considerations for the feelings of the families of the victims to be taken, but I think if the Israeli media were to broadcast and print pictures of the victims of the actions of Israeli soldiers, support for the country's very aggressive military policy might dwindle.
    I mean: If it's not nice then don't do it – doing it and not showing it is hypocritical.
    And the dehumanization which make the children believe that the tank missiles are not for Lebanese children, but for the “man with the turban” is precisely what makes wars possible.
    Apart from that, thanks for the explanation – it does not entirely take away the spookiness of the pictures, though. If Israel right now were in the process of responding to Hizbollah's rockets in a way that were
    a) in reasonable proportions,
    b) likely to produce the desired outcome or even harm Hizbollah,
    there would have been no anger over the pictures. They are – erroneously, if we look at the specific children and the specific picture – seen as consistent with Israel's violent and in the eye of many beholders wildly exaggerated attacks on first Gaza and now Lebanon.

    29. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  30. “If it's not nice then don't do it ” Hello? This is War!
    Nice isn't really an objective here.
    Should America have been “nice” during WWII?

    30. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  31. Let's fight a war, but let's do so “nicely”?
    Can't win a war by being nice.

    31. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  32. Perhaps not, but then don't hide what happens to the victims. If you must fight a war then do so, but don't prettify it.
    And what Israel is doing right now is not really hurting Hizbollah – an important point to be made.
    Destroying Lebanon's infrastructure and terrorizing her citizens doesn't hurt Hizbollah – rather, it strengthens it, relatively withing Lebanon, I mean.
    The Sandmonkey links to an analysis in Ha'aretz (http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/740649.html) which reaches the conclusion that the ongoing operations haven't hurt Hizbollah at all.

    32. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  33. Carsten, please do not take this thread into an argument/analysis about military tactics. That is really off topic. Many thanks, in advance…

    33. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  34. Okay, point taken.
    I'm glad you published the story behind the pictures, though – helps putting a human face on all sides of the conflict, and I think that's very important – I just wrote a small piece about the picture and your story on my own blog (Danish).
    I personally think these photos and their story as uncovered by you teaches a small tale precisely about the human face on both sides – and for that, I am grateful.

    34. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  35. I have to agree. I keep hearing reports from corrupt nato cronies as well as others who condemn Israel for fighting a disproportionate war while trying to protect their own citizens. Those is Lebanon should be thankful they are only targeting and cutting off Hezbollah’s escape routes. War is never nice or fair and no matter how accurate Israeli or American munitions might be, civilians will become casualties of war. This is just the nature of the game. If the Lebanese government really wants Hezbollah eradicated from their land, why make the statement that their army will align themselves with a terrorist organizations to fight Israel’s ground invasion? I’m not so sure the government really wants them out based on what I read….I could be misinformed though…
    As a former US Marine who loves his country, I understand the nature of both sides using whatever propaganda might be necessary to defeat the enemy if it 1.) preserves solidarity with one’s country and 2.) ends any conflict quickly (quicker means less loss of life over a long term war).
    - Wisconsin, United States

    35. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  36. Internationally, however, it seems that we are getting far more explicit footage in the past week, than we ever get from Iraq.

    36. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  37. Israeli actions are in reasonable proportion to the threat they face by Hezbollah, if not they are not responding hard enough. This is prooven by the fact that Hezbollah are still capable of targetting our civilian centers.

    37. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  38. It is certainly true that imagery is a potent weapon of misinformation and control – it always has been. It is also true that on both sides of this conflict the innocent are dying: literally and imaginatively, for how can a child that writes on bombs (what ever the circumstances under which they do so) retain the innocence that should be cherished in childhood? I would never look at any issue on the surface. But I would also delve further still. There are short term reasons for stress as to why this event took place, but have these people been asked why they remain in a place of bombardment? Or more importantly, why they went there in the first place? My own friends from Israel avoid the border areas at all cost: a huge difference from those that were recently evicted by the Israeli army and those that here live on the border fence. I am afraid that the expansionist logic of Israel, and its own extremism is manifest in families such as these, who stay generation after generation at the frontline, and who do not move for any cost. That, surely, is the next layer that must be investigated, and perhaps the image's meaning will be reverted once again.

    38. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  39. Anonymous -
    I wrote very clearly in my post that these people remained in Kiryat Shmona because they did not have the money to leave and did not have family in other parts of Israel to host them. In other words, they were hostages of their socio-economic circumstances.
    “Why did they go there?” They live there! Kiryat Shmona is their home.
    And I fail to see what “expansionism” has to do with this story. Kiryat Shmona is and always has been inside Israel's internationally recognized 1948 borders.

    39. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  40. “how can a child that writes on bombs (what ever the circumstances under which they do so) retain the innocence that should be cherished in childhood?”
    Any child who has to live in a bomb shelter because they are being shelled by enemy rockets has already been forced out of innocence.

    40. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  41. It is time for the Israeli Government to remind Israeli journalists about their responsibility as Israeli citizens not to do things that could hurt the war effort.

    41. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  42. Almost a century and a half ago an American General said something that seems to equally apply here.
    “You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I will make more sacrifices to-day than any of you to secure peace.”
    http://www.rjgeib.com/thoughts/sherman/sherman-to-burn-atlanta.html

    42. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  43. Thank you, LIsa.

    43. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  44. A couple of points:
    While I understand how these pictures came about, I am not at all sure it was taken entirely out of context. I remain unconvinced that the parents of these children were unaware that these shells were intended to kill people. You don't need to be bombarded with images of dead people to know that explosions are a bad thing. I'm pretty sure no one in this group were singing peace songs for the Lebanese.
    Secondly: Media storm? huh? where? You mention the Arab blogosphere–a very very specific targeted group with a very very specific audience. The vast majority of the Media have been completely forgiving of these pictures. Can you imagine if these were Palestinian children signing off on missiles to Israel? I wouldn't have been able to pick up a newspaper, or turn on the news, w/out running into them. Don't you understand that a large part of the anger comes from this lopsided, this wholly biased and racist view of the conflict?

    44. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  45. Sony Pony -
    The fact is, both Arabs and Israelis are constantly complaining that the media is biased against them. As I have written before on this blog, the Middle East is like a Rorschach inkblot test: different people(s) look at the same thing and each see(s) something completely different.
    My point is that there is a climate of hate in the Middle East that makes reasoned debate nearly impossible and forgiving attitudes nearly impossible.

    45. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  46. ؛Ya, israelis are right. The media is biased against them. It sometimes SOMETIMES shows what they are doing. Thanks to the internet, people are getting more information and nobody depends on CNN or FOX anymore. The truth will be told, and Lisa you know what, The democratic government in the middle east can not censor every thing for everyone, maybe in israel and US but not internet. And Why do you expect people believe what that wrote here. If people do not write comments to say that it is nonsense is because they get use to these stupid excuses that you (israelis) try find when something looks bad. Nobody knows the initial intentions behind these writings.

    46. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  47. The reporter that was there is the second best source to know what the intentions behind these writings are. They took the picture, and Lisa has published the context.

    47. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  48. Thanks for the explanation, Lisa. I too was put off by the picture.
    But notice what an uproar it caused simply because they are Jews. If it had been Palestinian children doing this (and it frequently is, and much worse), no one would have batted an eye.
    Another sign of the double standard Israel is held too.
    But to some degree, I think there should be a double standard. As Jews, we have to hold the moral high ground. If we become like the animals, there's not much reason for us to be around anymore.
    Like I said over at the Muquata–teach our kids to defend and stand up for themselves. Teach them to fight. But don't teach them to like it.

    48. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  49. There should be no double standard, if there were no double standard our moral high ground would be blinding obvious to everyone, especially the people who don't know much about the conflict.

    49. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  50. I've bookmarked you. Thanks so much for your reasoned essays. They are much needed in this time. Pat in Texas

    50. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  51. Is this a joke?
    Seriously, i don't see the “well written explanation” that people are talking about. Everyone knows what you wrote.
    Terrorists (with their kids holding guns) can say the exact same thing.
    Our kids saw the guns and saw us and they consider us heroes so they thought it's cool and they did just like us.
    Then some photographer showed from nowhere and took a pic !! bad timing.. !!
    ARE YOU FREAKING SERIOUS !!!
    What the “parents” did by letting their childred do this is “NON FORGIVABLE” no matter what !!!
    And what the children did is un acceptable…
    Think again people..
    What if you saw a “palestenian” child doing the same… (and you did) ..
    You never gave them such a stupid execuse.. you critisized them and their families..
    And you forgot that for them, israelians are “Evils”. You look the same to them as the “hassan nasr allah” looks for you and your kids….

    51. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  52. Max M this is an healthy activity that people do during war to help promote morale.
    It has a long tradition.
    The children did nothing wrong (except for their spelling perhaps but since I don't know Hebrew I really can't say. Perhaps they can pratice their spelling while they are down in the bomb shelter during the next attack to keep their mind off their situation).

    52. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  53. What the “parents” did by letting their childred do this is “NON FORGIVABLE” no matter what !!!
    I agree, the excuses may be valid but they do not wash. It doesn't matter that these kids have spent ages in bomb shelters, they should not be standing next to shells, period.
    BUT, these kids are not holding guns, but pens – get it into perspective.

    53. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  54. Lisa, Thank you for that. Will link to it on my blog, with your permission.
    Though, i'm not really buying the argument of “they've never seen a dead body on teli”. This is not Switzerland! – this is Israel, which has been, well, almost continuously at war with various countries/groups since it was created, killing people and having people killed.
    Or is it only the bodies of terrorism victims shown on your television?
    Also, while I can understand the particular context of those photos, I refuse the idea that Israeli children are not endocrinated — not like them. Sorry, not buying that. No moral judgement involved here, but the the facts, including the portrayal of the palestinians/arabs/even arab israelis in the media, school books, prove otherwise.
    Thanks — until next time!

    54. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  55. Lisa
    I don't have the slightest sympathy for the Hezbollah, but I also cannot tolerate propaganda, regardless the side it would originate from.
    You said “missiles crashing and booming on their town day and night. The noise was terrifying, people were dying outside, [in Kiryat Shmona, where the photos have been taken]
    Could you please tell me, EXACTLY how many people have died in Kiryat Shmona ? I'm asking that because I have the impression that you are trying to create an atmosphere in order to justif;y the children, or rather their parents. Anyway, they do not seem as terrified as that to me.
    But then maybe you're right, and Kiryat Shmona really lies in ruins. In that case I apologise for my being agressive.
    Thanks in advance for your eventual response
    Mavros Gatos
    Greece

    55. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  56. Mavros -
    If you had been to the northern border over the past few days then you would have been terrified – unless you were blind and stone deaf. More than 1,000 missiles were launched in one week on civilian areas. The children don't seem terrified to you in the photo? That is because they were so happy that the bombardment had temporarily stopped and they were able to go outside of the bomb shelters and breathe some fresh air for the first time in five days.
    How many people have died in Kiryat Shmona? I don't know, but don't you think that one would be too many? As for the amount of destruction, again, what is your point? My point is that this war is horrible for both Lebanese and Israelis; your point seems to be something else entirely, but I am not quite sure what it is. I sort of get the feeling that you think the kids didn't suffer enough for your tastes. But you weren't there, so how in the world would you know what they went through?

    56. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  57. Look, if you try to justify this relatively mild act because of the relatively mild suffering of these kids, then it does not take too much effort to try to justify the much more intense antagonism in Palestinian and Arab kids, given that the death ratio is about ten to one and the destruction far more. I don't think that argument is particularly efficacious.

    57. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  58. Justify? Argument? Neither word is appropriate.
    Again (and for the last time) this post is about explaining and putting into context. And please re-read the last two paragraphs of my post again – you know, the bit about a climate of hatred. I would be (and have been) equally critical of bloggers who post photos of children posing with weapons as an illustration of the supposedly violent culture of Palestinians and Iranians.
    I abhor propaganda and hyperbole from any source and in any context. Full stop and 'nuff said.

    58. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  59. OK, fine, I accept that. But trying to `explain the context' is rarely effective, because there's a defensive mechanism on the other side, an interpretive framework, that does not uually allow for the reception and digestion of such attempts — how easy is it to try to explain to your average Israeli the context of Palestian hate? BTW, there's another rerlevant point, you imply that these kids and their parent are rather unsophisticated — this applies far moe to the majority of people in Israel's neighbouring populations.
    Best regards

    59. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  60. Why must the Israelis be ruthless?
    Because their enemies are ruthless, and if the Israelis aren't more so then their enemies win and they will be annihilated.
    But this bomb signing thing is so small. It is not immoral. Not in the least. It is a wartime tradition. It is kind of like black humor. It builts morale.
    It is perfectly healthy for the children to be doing this. And it isn't dangerous to be next to the tank missiles. They can't explode unless fired.
    By the way, for those who say that this is just like having children sing songs about how they are going to grow up to be suicide bombers, it isn't.

    60. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  61. Abraham Lincoln. the American President during our Civil war was known to be a gentle man. But when discussing how to fight the war with his cabinet he said the following.
    “Lincoln: One matter further, gentlemen. We fight on their level. With trickery, brutality, finality. We match their evil. I know, I was reputed to be a gentle man. But I was commander in chief during the four bloodiest years of my country's history. I gave orders that sent a hundred thousand men to their death. at the hands of their brothers. There is no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war except its ending. And we are fighting for the survival of the Union.”
    Actually, it was an Star Trek episode.
    But it was a pretty good Star Trek episode.
    http://www.voyager.cz/tos/epizody/78savagecurtaintrans.htm

    61. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  62. I think Lisa is right. People should try to understand and generously interpret how other people feel and act. And they should try to provoke a similar response from the other side.

    62. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  63. I think Amir doesn't understand that you are reporting facts, not an op-ed.

    63. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  64. Thank you for your background information!

    64. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  65. lisa,
    i'm not sure how other people took these pictures, but the main point is that israelis are human too, and that they err too.
    i remember how many circulated images of hezbollah and hamas children carrying guns; two year olds who probably had no idea what was going on, yet those pictures were used to explain a “culture of hate.” in reality, the setting for those is no different then the setting for these.
    although such pictures may be understandable, they are in no way right, whether it is the arab children or of these israeli children innocently signing missiles.
    as i said, all these pictures do is show that israelis also err, that they also make moral errors (this time on the parents side), and they are not on a moral highground – hence the “uproar”.
    stay safe.
    laz.

    65. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  66. Of course the Israelis are humans, but so are the Arabs too! All I wanted to say is that you were trying to create impressions by saying “people were dying all around “, in order to prove the Israeli children less guilty of hatred than they actually are. One dead person in their village would be too many, you are right. But 500+ are far more than one…
    It is a terrible situation. I am ashamed to be a human.

    66. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  67. Oh, pleese.
    To make so much out of this morale building activity. It is war after all.
    But it does show why the Israeli media needs to be required to submit themselves to government review regarding miltary/national security matters. There should be a requirement that the media has to give their stuff to the government so they can decide whether such stuff should be published.
    That is how such stuff was handled in America during WWII. We didn't all the media to publish anything that could harm the war effort.

    67. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  68. You are right.
    They even said it about gossip: loose lips, sink ships.

    68. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  69. Hey laz:
    “i remember how many circulated images of hezbollah and hamas children carrying guns; two year olds who probably had no idea what was going on, yet those pictures were used to explain a “culture of hate.” in reality, the setting for those is no different then the setting for these.”
    When you arm a two year old, strap fake bombs around their waists, it is a culture of hatred.
    This is not good, but it is incomparible to Israel's enemies.

    69. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  70. Pretty much everything I wanted to say has been said by other commenters.
    Not an easy post to write or read. Thank you for doing it.

    70. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  71. Lisa, slightly OT.
    Is it possible to change the anonymous setting to allow people (or make them) use an alias without having them sign in, the multiple “anons” are getting really confusing and it looks in some cases (from similar tone/language) that sometimes the same person is backing him/herself up?

    71. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  72. Hey Lisoosh -
    I really have no idea how to do that. I'll ask the experts (Joey! Are you reading this?) and see what I can do.

    72. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  73. war brings out the worst forms of jingoism and sensationalism.
    i don't, however, know if the fault lies with the photographers. the pictures are what they are. the fault would lie in how we so often seek to demonize depending on our worldviews.
    e+

    73. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  74. During WWII in America every picture, every story regarding the war effort had to go through a government official whose job it was to decide if the picture and/or story would get to be published. The military and the press worked hand in hand to ensure that nothing that would harm the war effort would be published.
    That is what the Israel Government needs to do now.

    74. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  75. Enough! This is NOT WWII.

    75. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  76. Pictures without context tell a story, sometimes that story is inaccurate.
    Tuvia Grossman is a prime example of how pictures are misused – as were the images of Al Durah (http://seconddraft.org).
    That is why misleading pictures should not be published by our media services.

    76. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  77. Hi Lisa,
    I second the previous post. I put my alias up there because people know me that way. I was surprised to find that it had been change to anon.
    Thanks,
    Bill
    SempreGumby
    learning how not to hate

    77. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  78. Lisa,
    Thank you for explaining the picture and putting things in perspective. It's sad and shameful how irresponsible journalists can be sometimes (nay, often).
    I happen to think both Israelis and Lebanese (and the West as well) should get to see more of the uncensored consequences of war. It's often so easy to armchair quarterback these matters while far removed from harm's way, when the innocent victims (on both sides) are faceless or mere numbers on a tally.
    And thank you, overall for this blog which is a great example of moderation and enlightenment, in what seems like a sea of hatred these days.
    -A Moderate Lebanese

    78. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  79. Perhaps so, then all sides should disclose all images.
    The reality is that Israeli's do not want to see the death and therefore the images are rarely published – this results in only one side of the conflict being represented.

    79. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  80. Lisa, if you saw GMT's post on Kos I will email him this link and try to get him to apologize. He put together the picture in the post and one of two Lebanese men crying in an irrigation channel, which were in a photo collection by Der Spiegel.

    80. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  81. Found your blog through SM's blog, which I hold in very high esteem. It's good stuff, and I'll check it out often!

    81. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  82. Lisa, thank you so much!!! I was sickened on one hand by the photos and on the other hand by the Palestinian blogger's manipulation of them to demonize these children and create cheap demagogy out of a complex human situation. Your responsible and serious examination of this story was badly needed, and I am completely with you in denouncing incitement to hatred, dehumanization and violence on either sad. Thank you again.

    82. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  83. Lisa,
    Thank you for clarifying the context of the photo. I can understand soldiers signing shells during a war, but agree that children shouldn't become part of its rituals of rage and power. (I also agree with the safety issue: even if it hasn't been fused, live ammunition is dangerous.)

    83. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  84. Now even Tom Tomorrow -who's usually a smart guy – has put this pic on his blog. With a really bad paparazzi style commment below it.
    Which makes we think again: is it possible to have a sane conversation about the MidEast?
    Pics like that -without a proper explanation – r exactly what makes people go nuts and start ranting insanely.

    84. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  85. I am not shocked at all by these pictures.
    This event of a few children writing on ordinance is meaningless. According to Lisa, the children merely drew flags while the parents wrote a rather mild message. Even if the children participated in writing of the message, so what?
    The children are happily doodling in innocence. They are not emanating hate. They are not supporting death of any person other than Nasrallah. This act of producing a rather placid flag or message to their tormentor is utterly inconsequential until latched upon by those who have anti Israeli agendas.
    The children's acts are meaningless. Innocence of the children dictated their innocent message in an act of innocence because that's what the whole innocent event was. Desire for Nasrallah's termination = innocent desire. Desire for Nasrallah's good health = wicked desire.
    I see what is good and true. A wish for peace.

    85. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  86. De-humanizing victims is a specialty of the main stream media – in Israel, Saudi Arabia, the United States, the rest of the Middle East and everywhere else – all enemies are not human. Who needs to identify with an enemy?

    86. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  87. lisa, i'm a lebanese living in the US and like so many others am stuck to the net, horrified at the events. i got to your blog from “le monde” as they mentioned you in an article. i'm weary of propaganda pictures so the above photo didn't do much, but some of the carnage and war scenes are just too nauseating to be true. i wanted to tell u that i'm impressed with your efforts to understand this tension between arabs and israelis from a more rational, objectivist attitude. and your anti-war rallying. my question is: does the media have much pull on the govt in israel, and what is it leaning towards right now, war or anti-war (can't say peace, it has too many different meanings at the moment)?
    Rouba

    87. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  88. Hi Rouba,
    There's an ongoing debate in Israel as to the extent of the media's influence over the government. I see the media as more effective in influencing the government on domestic issues rather than foreign policy or war tactics; there is a mainstream attitude that tends to muzzle dissent during times of war because security concerns are seen as paramount when the country is under attack. This is an understandable attitude, of course, but I think it is also problematic. As one prominent Israeli journalist said to me the other day, Are we again going to wait until after the damage is done to examine our mistakes retroactively?
    Right now the most popular mainstream newspapers are behind the army and the government, which is why the consensus in favour of the military actions continues to hold. But Haaretz newspaper is very critical – even more critical than most of the mainstream Western media, and far more insightful. The problem is that Haaretz specifically describes itself as a left wing newspaper and it is seen as a reflection of the intellectual elite, so its opinions are often rejected out of hand by the centre. It is an important newspaper and no politician can afford to ignore it, but during times of crisis when the mood of the country is that we must be unified in the face of an external threat, it has very limited mainstream influence.
    Over the past two days critical voices have started to make themselves heard, but only in a limited sense and they have not yet affected mass opinion.

    88. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  89. Hi Lisa,
    I think you are doing an excellent service by giving a “behind the scenes” (or behind the camera) view to the conflict. I have to disagree with your analysis in this post, however. It does your Arab and Lebanese readership no good to gloss over the fact that IDF military measures are overwhelmingly supported across the political spectrum in Israel. In fact, two latest Haaretz editorials that I read are both pro-war (although with a longer term diplomatic emphasis). Amir Peretz, a leader of the political left in Israel is a defense minister, and famous dove Yossi Beilin is not openly criticizing the government, as he usually does in case of operations in West Bank and Gaza.
    Israeli voices for immediate cease-fire and negotiations with Hizbullah are fairly marginal now, as your post about that demo in Tel Aviv confirmed. I would be interested to know who are the “critical voices” that “started to make themselves heard”.

    89. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  90. Someone said: “If it had been Palestinian children doing this (and it frequently is, and much worse), no one would have batted an eye.”
    This is Palestinian children are so often portrayed as indoctrinated into violence, such that they are seen as these violent creatures. They are so constantly portrayed this way that any similar picture would have instantly been interpreted within this framework. It seems to get forgotten that they are also children. I hope that every child, in every war, will be seen with the same sensitivity and compassion and understanding that Lisa extends to these girls.
    I did wonder what Lisa would say about this. Several commentators implied something along the lines of: “It is not the same as when Palestinian children are seen with guns,” etc. I see why it is not *exactly* the same. But there seem to be many similarities. I think it is likely that Palestinian children are responding to the fear and stress of violence and the attitudes of those around them. Children respond to that kind of fear (which even children who are very safe tend to have) by hoping for destruction of the thing that scares them. Because they are so young, the actual violence is an abstraction to them and they imagine that it will only target 'bad' people (which is the attitudes adults around them seem to have–they trust the adults around them). They deal with their fear and powerlessness by hoping that whatever method adults use to address the violence they experience will be for their safety, to return things to normal. They may seem to be 'pro-war or pro-bombing' but like Lisa said, they aren't thinking about it as real.
    Lisa, your explanation makes perfect sense to me and it shows how much we need to understand the humanity of everyone when wars happen. That's the first thing war does to people–makes us think of others as inhuman.
    'Putting things in perspective' –this is something we always have to work for.

    90. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  91. You make a very good point.

    91. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  92. I’m sorry for my apparent naivety, but would someone explain to me the true “horror” of anybody writing on tank shells even if they will be used for killing? The title of the post is “putting into perspective” but it does no such thing. In a world were liberalism is the keyword, and liberalism is; you leave me alone I leave you alone”, right? And who are these girls hurting? Will the fact that they scribbled a msg on the bomb mean that more people will be killed? Hurt? No. So how can anyone take more then 5 seconds out of a day filled with more important and relevant images and actions to consider some adolescent girls scribbling on a tank shell? If you want to talk about hate, look at the Arab media and school system, where kids are indoctrinated in hate. Where kids learn to shoot weapons in summer camp. Where kids attend rallies with machine guns. This is beyond redundant and pathetic. What a world. I cant get over the reactions full of rage and shock. Where did you people grow up? On some utopian village where everybody gets along and hate and selfishness has been eradicated from the human emotions??? Ps to all Lebanese: you have had all the time in the world to stand up and rid yourself of Hezbollah. When you feel the pain of being attacked that’s when you wake up? And if so… Blame yourselves, or Hezbollah, to blame Israel is nothing less then a pathetic and babyish attempt to avoid responsibility. This is a war started on your side of the border. War isn’t a game. This is a life or death situation, where more is at stake then mere individuals, Israeli or Lebanese. That’s right, I said it!!!! This is the survival of a state. Of a race. Of a religion. We are fighting for our lives. If some Lebanese were killed we do not jump for joy, nor admittedly do we weep. We pray that this will be over soon. But we do not let our country, our values, our rights and our very lives hang in balance because the Lebanese don’t want us shooting missiles at the terrorists in their midst. We don’t go looking to hurt civilians, indeed if our enemy would fight us face to face we would welcome the chance. But they chose to escalate to the current situation, and we have an obligation to protect if not our nation and way of life, then our right to live safely in our land, in our homes. The Lebanese want to live a life without the threat of Israeli missiles falling on their heads, well that’s coincidental because so do Israelis.

    92. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  93. Very good post- I'm glad it seems to really be making the rounds. Last night my husband asked me if I had ever heard of the blog “On The Face.” I was in shock- how had HE ever heard of it? Then I realized this post must have been mentioned in one of the Hebrew blogs or forums he reads- and it was.

    93. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  94. As someone who's been to Kiryat Shmona back in 1981, I'm at least familiar with the general area of the settlements and perhaps even the attitudes of the people who live there, assuming things have not changed.
    Ironically while I was there in the summer of that year, Israel was in a continual state of war with their neighbors Syria and Lebanon. A few hours after I left the settlement, it was hit with Katyusha rockets, and two people were killed. The more things change, the more they stay the same I suppose.
    At that time, being attacked in this way was part and parcel of Israeli life, something everyone just seem to accept and live with. A difficult thing a young teenager from South Florida to grasp.
    I imagine that life for people who lived across the border in Lebanon and Syria must of been quite similar, since the Israelis would always respond to these attacks with artillery, just as they do today.
    Strange to see people living what, for all intents and purposes is a normal life, a normal life with the addition of bulletproof tractors, bulldozers and Uzis slung on their backs, while they picked fruit or worked in the field.
    At the time everyone moved around Israel on buses, much as I imagine they do today, and on those buses everyone kept their firearms close at hand, even while they ate or sang or conversed, because everyone knew that at any moment you might need that weapon to defend themselves.
    As I look at these pictures of children living in a war zone, I realized that regardless of your circumstance, life goes on, at least while you're among the living, and you must make the best of your circumstance. Children draw, and when they draw they often depict the things that frighten them, and confront those things with their messages and images. It is the nature of all children.
    Kids who live in such a world make games of war, just as children have done throughout human history. In fact even adults think of their circumstance in similar terms. As I look at these pictures of children writing messages on artillery shells, I am reminded of the soldiers during World War II addressing messages to Adolph on the side bombs being loaded onto B-17's headed for Germany. They often included humor and exaggerated caricatures and drawings, sometimes even elaborate drawings if they had the time. Or the Marines during Vietnam who wrote similar messages on their artillery shells, addressing them to Ho Chi Minh.
    Though I'm no expert, I imagine this behavior is part of the survival response shared by all of us. For whenever human beings find themselves under horrendous circumstance, we draw on every resource at our command to help us cope with our environment.
    I have little doubt if Lebanese children were given the opportunity, they would draw on the side of Katyusha rockets, addressing them to there perceived Israeli enemies. This isn't about hate, it's about survival, and the ability to make the best of whatever life throws your way.
    I also have no doubt that if we put these children together, they would play and draw and laugh together. Of course they would fight as well, but they would not destroy each other, because they've not yet learned to play the war game, a game where everyone dies.
    If you were to ask these same young people, if they wanted to play a game where they would end up dead, and all their friends would end up dead at the end of the game, they would of course refuse without even giving it a second thought.
    How unfortunate that many of their parents no longer retain this childhood wisdom.
    When will we learn to practice war no more?

    94. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  95. Ecclesiastes 3:1-8
    To every thing there is a season,
    and a time to every purpose under the heaven:
    A time to be born, a time to die;
    a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted;
    A time to kill, and a time to heal;
    a time to break down, and a time to build up;
    A time to weep, and a time to laugh;
    a time to mourn, and a time to dance;
    A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together;
    a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;
    A time to get, and a time to lose;
    a time to keep, and a time to cast away;
    A time to rend, and a time to sew;
    a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
    A time to love, and a time to hate;
    A time of war, and a time of peace.
    Only the Dead have seen the End of War – Plato

    95. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  96. Funny, in my copy of the bible, that stuff's not in bold. Although I've seen those bibles with Jesus's words in red; maybe you've got the “hawk edition”…

    96. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  97. The context you provide is interesting, but it doesn't change a bit the cruelty of the images. Those missiles will kill people anyway, just as Hezbola's will. Well, no, actually, they'll kill some more people.
    But it's the same: we should advocate the end of the slaughter, not Hezbola's killings nor Israel's killings.

    97. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  98. That end comes when our soldiers are returned and when Hezbollah is either crushed or stop attacking us.

    98. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  99. Actually, anyone who's ever been in Israel for any length of time KNOWS the Israelis do NOT teach their kids to hate and would prefer to keep their kids having NORMAL lives as long as possible.
    Israelis want to see their kids ENJOY their childhoods, and try to keep them as FAR from anything to do with these wars as possible.
    Also up on the border used to be the “Good Gate”, where Arabs could come across for urgent medical needs, at one stage.
    I also know, from spending two years in Jerusalem in the early nineties that Israelis beat their OWN breasts about how they treat the Arabs. I wish I could have said the same thing for a large amount of Palestinians I cam across when I was there.
    And I know that Israelis seeing the pictures of Lebanese kids also shed a tear for them.
    Let's remember something…the Israelis gave WARNINGS to the civilians to evacuate the trouble areas. Anyone ever hear of HAMAS or Hezbollah doing that?
    Let's be realistic. Hezbollah couldn't have cared less about the Israeli kids in the picture shown here. EVERY Israeli is a target to Hezbollah. Even these kids. And no Hezbollah person will ever shed a tear over a dead Jewish child.
    I won't begrudge the Israeli kids, though, or their parents, in this picture. They only want Nazrallah and his crew stopped.
    Pity the Lebanese Government couldn't have done that.

    99. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  100. Some families teach hate, some each tolerance. (and other teach their children that this crisis means the rapture is nigh (sorry, I couldn't resist putting that in).
    I think that a key point here is that, you can't generalize about a country's attitude. You have to approach every country as containing diversity of human voices and perceptions. We just don't get to hear about the voices that aren't newsworthy.

    100. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  101. I think it's ironic that you mention this: “I wonder how those people would feel if Israelis were to look at a photo of a Palestinian child wearing a mock suicide belt in a Hamas demonstration and conclude that all Palestinians – nay, all Arabs – are evil.”
    The image of a Palestinian toddler in costume, at a local university party, as a suicide bomber, was released by the Israeli government and shown all over America. The reaction was, as you say, was that “all Arabs – are evil.”
    These images are being used to show that Israel, is at times, not always as innocent as they want the western world to believe. All people in that region, in times of war, have commited terrible atrocities against their enemy. Just as we are witnessing rogue US soldiers doing in Iraq.
    The Israeli – Arab conflict is complex and has many facets. In my opinion, both sides are wrong for what they do to each other and both sides are guilty of inflicting horrendous pain on each others innocent civilians. The constant cycle of retaliation will never end until one side stops, for good.
    This is a terrible image. However, the Israeli's deserve the public's outrage, just as the Palestinians deserve the outrage over a toddler dressed as a suicide bomber. Children should not be used as pawns in war.

    101. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  102. I have mentioned several times in my blog, on other people's blogs and I think even in this comments thread that I am completely opposed to using photos like the one you describe in the first paragraph to manipulate opinions and emotions. I am quite aware that those photos are used by Jewish and Israeli quasi-governmental agencies for that purpose, and I find that abhorrent. Clear?

    102. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  103. No, I am not “clear”.
    It's obvious, that you spent time and a great deal of effort to explain and justify these photo's.
    If you truly feel the way you say you do, then you would have shown the same outrage everyone else has over these photo's. Instead, you dissected them and explained them away, that they were cooped up and frustrated people. Implying they deserve the benefit of the doubt.
    Any explanation by arab counterparts on the Palestinian toddler are automatically dismissed.
    I don't feel that any of the parents that allow their children to be used as pawns in war, deserve any sympathy for their actions.
    Your actions do not appear to match your words here.

    103. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  104. Chris, I think we're going to beat this thing to death at this rate. I've responded to your comment and I don't have anything to add. If you want to stay angry, then do that.

    104. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  105. Chris,
    The children didn't do anything wrong.
    This is a common wartime activity. Writing on bombs goes way back. US Soliders used to do it before dropping the bombs on German cities.
    It is something that helps build morale by having the children express their determination to endure their current situation.

    105. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  106. Hi Lisa,
    Thanks for your investigation about these terrible pictures. There were some open questions. Unfortunately I was not able to confirm your story because Mr. Schreiner, the photographer, is right now in the area and not in his office. But AP (Associated Press) Germany told me by email that these pictures are not manipulated by the journalists. This is important because you suggest that the foreign journalists had created the atmosphere and finally this situation. According to the statement of AP this is not true. There was no influence in any way.
    I want to note that there were other 11 photographers like Pedro Ugarte, working for Associated France Press. What’s about these guys?
    Another question: Is Mr. Schreiner is a jewish journalist and is living in Jerusalem?
    Question: Can you name the other journalists you have talked with them. If this is not for the public, you can send me an email.
    Please don't misunderstand my questions. I want to confirm your story and clear some open questions.
    Best wishes and greetings from Germany.

    106. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  107. In response to your questions, I want to make a few things very clear:
    1) I do not believe and did not imply in my post that the photographers created the atmosphere which led to those photos.
    2) I do not hold any of the journalists or photographers who were at the scene responsible in any way for manipulating the photos or the people who are shown in the photos.
    3) I do not believe the photos were manipulated. I believe they were used in a manipulative way.
    3) Mr. Scheiner is an Israeli and he and I have friends in common, which is why I was able to contact him so quickly. I do not think he did anything wrong. I think the editors who printed those photos without any background explanation were irresponsible, but that has nothing to do with Mr. Scheiner.
    4) I mentioned twice in my article that there were 12 photographers in the scene. The reason I mentioned only Mr. Scheiner by name is because he is the only one I spoke to, and because the most widely disseminated photos of the incident are credited to his name.
    This article is not about irresponsible photographers or journalists. I am critical of the atmosphere of hatred that made people misjudge the photos, and I am critical of the newspaper editors who did not trouble to include some background information about the photographs.

    107. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  108. Lisa, doesn't the fact that Mr. Scheiner is an Israeli raise the question of whether in this instance Mr. Scheiner put advancing his own career ahead of what was best for his country?
    Wouldn't that be a valid criticism of Mr. Scheiner?

    108. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  109. Hi Mary -
    Sebastian Scheiner is a photojournalist and he was doing his job, just like all the other photojournalists who were there. As Gal Beckerman points out in this article, “any photographer would be out of his mind not to capture this shot.”
    The photographers capture images of what they see. It is up to us to interpret them.

    109. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  110. “Shelly emphasized several times that none of the parents or children had expressed any hatred toward the Lebanese people.”
    Are you mentally challenged? They signed bombs to the Lebanese and that doesn't convey hatred? This is one of the most dishonest comments I think that I have ever read.

    110. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  111. The writing on the shells says, “To Nasrallah.” It does not say “to the Lebanese people.”
    Nasrallah is the one who initiated the launching of missiles into Israel, Nasrallah is the one who was behind the cross-border incursion that was the catalyst to the current conflict and Nasrallah is the one who appears daily on television, avowing to continue launching missiles at Israel. Whilst I think that what the parents wrote is stupid and immature, the point is that the message is directed specifically at the man who has proclaimed himself the enemy of Israel.
    There is nothing about the Lebanese people written in those messages.

    111. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  112. AM AMERICAN OPINION (first time blogger)
    First let me apologize if these comments are posted wrongly.
    I am an American whose parents were born in Lebanon. I am 68 years old and visited Beirut once and have nver been to isreal. Many of my personal friends are Jewish.
    Today there was a mention of this blog on the drudge report.
    http://www.drudge.com
    So I am not sure that I am doing this correctly.
    The salvation of your region and the salavation of the world may be the direct contact of ordinary people with one another. Withot the filters of the mainstream press and the bias of governments.
    For years I have had a theory that the governments on all sides of your conflict really don't want a total and permanent end to it.
    The USA provides billions of dollars to Isreal, and the Saudi's and Egypt and others provide billions of dollars to Palestine.
    With true peace, these hugh flows of dollars stop and the politicians would have to do real work to survive. They couldn't keep stealing.
    When you consider the amount of financial support that has been provided over the last five years alone and devide it by the population it becomes clear that every man woman and child in that region would be wealthy if they each got their share.
    Wealthy people are healthy people. Wealthy people are well fed. Wealthy people are well educated. Wealthy people are reasonable and comfortable. But above all, wealthy people don't want to waste or lose their wealth. Wealthy people don't fight.
    Think about it.
    Is this really one big conspiracy of the politicians on all sides doing what they always do. Perpetuate their own power at the expense of the lives and properties of others.??

    112. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  113. Really good job, Lisa.
    This seems to be another case in which there's much more to a story than what appears in most media accounts. Reality is often more complicated, more nuanced, and more banal than the impression one gets in the press.
    I'm glad to see that your reporting is getting some links. I think one comment mentions Harry's Place. The problem is that it may not get enough links. This may be a case of preaching to the choir. What about the BBC Web site, or the Guardian's or CNN's? I don't know if they showed the photo. They may well have. But they certainly won't give much space to any explanation or follow-up.
    Still, it's nice to see something out there.
    Best wishes,
    Joanne

    113. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  114. You people are so buried in your own “I'm a victim” bullshit that you're missing the bigger point: war destroys innocence. It destroys God's work.

    114. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  115. Hi Lisa. I read your story (finally since the Sandmonkey incident) and I don't understand the last sentence. “And we let them.” What do you mean by that?

    115. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  116. After reading the journalist's 'explanation' of the girls' actions, I am shocked that your readers will humanize the actions of these Israelis without doing the same for the Lebanese. Yes, these poor girls were forced to stay hidden for days and were likely ignorant of the ramifications of their actions. Yet, consider the lives of many Lebanese who lived in Southern Lebanon- many lost family members in the 1982 invasion and view Sharon and Israel with the same hatred Israelis share for Nasrallah. They grew up ignorant of all the facts knowing nothing more than to seek vengence on those who destroyed their homes and forced them to flee their land. If we attempt to get the inside story to understand Israelis' reasoning in this conflict, the same needs to be done for the other side.
    As for other comments posted, it is troubling to think that we should just overlook children writing 'innocent messages' on weapons of death and write it off as child-like. If they see their parents doing it, they will likely grow up with the same anger and perpetuate the cycle of violence.
    Unfortunately, this story and many like it, show how the media is subjective in the treatment of its subjects to please their target audience.

    116. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  117. This post is about a specific photo. If I were to expand it as you suggest, I would have to write a book.

    117. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  118. I would like to ask all those people who were shocked to see this picture to try and put themselves in the shoes of those little girls. Try to imagine your town being bombarded on and off since before you were born. And I'm talking about AFTER the Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. Would you yourself not wish that each and every shell would be a direct hit to those who have tormented you just because you were alive and jewish? Children in Israel are not taught to celebrate when innocent children are killed. When terrorists are killed however, you can't blame them for celebrating.

    118. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm
  119. This is quit an education for me. I'm left with a lot to think about.

    119. Anonymous
    on December 31st, 1969 at 6:59 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*