headermask image

header image

Visiting Israel? Learn to shoot!

Caliber 3's instructors teach tourists how to shoot guns. Credit: Caliber 3 website

Gone are the days, it seems, when the slogan was, “Visiting Israel? Come see the holy sites!” On Arutz 7, a right-wing news outlet that takes a pro-settler editorial stance, one of the banner ads that appears most frequently bears the slogan “Visiting Israel? Learn to shoot!” The click-through ads lead to the website of a private security company called Caliber 3, which boasts of working “…in close cooperation with the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) in the field of Counter Terrorism.”

The ‘learn to shoot’ slogan appears under a video interview with two American-born residents of Shilo, a Jewish settlement in the northern West Bank; the video is embedded in an article titled, “Human face of demonized ‘settlers’.” In the video, the two speak of their love for Shilo, their biblical connection to the place and the affection they feel for their neighbours – although they do not specify whether they are speaking of their Jewish neighbours within the settlement, or their Palestinian neighbours. The interview was filmed by a visiting American couple who told Arutz 7 that they sought “…to make the Jews who live in Judea and Samaria look human….because they are usually so demonized by the media.”

Caliber 3 offers a wide range of services, from an 8-week course in “establishing government combat units” (€12,000) to a 1-week course called “Suicide bombers – knowing the enemy: detection, prevention & neutralization” (€2,000). There is also an “exciting new program for tourists” - a 2-hour course that includes a 7-minute lecture in anti-terrorism tactics, an “impressive” 15-minute show of fighting and shooting skills and – based on the photos – an opportunity to shoot some guns.

Based on the photos that appear on Caliber 3′s website, the courses appear to be popular amongst religious Jews who are visiting from the United States. There is some cognitive dissonance in seeing paunchy middle-aged men wearing dress shirts and yarmulkes aiming an automatic weapon, or a girl dressed in typical modern Orthodox female style – a jean skirt and long-sleeved casual shirt – assuming a combat stance while holding a weapon that appears far too large for her. The instructors, meanwhile, look very ‘army,’ but they wear civilian shoes and khaki uniforms without rank or insignia.

Somehow, a certain brand of Judaism and militarism have become part of the settler movement’s ideological identity. For many religious settlers, the army is an extension of their identity in the sense of serving the state that controls the land mentioned in the bible, that was given by God. For American Jews who support the settler movement’s ideology, and share their conviction that they are surrounded by enemies that present an existential threat, a course in the use of firearms might feel as important as a visit to the Western Wall or the Tomb of the Patriarchs in terms of identity tourism – not to mention power. For Caliber 3′s bareheaded instructors, the settlers’ ideology is certainly a lucrative source of income.

Cross-posted to +972 Magazine.

Do you love me (even though I sing like an Arab)?

Sarit Hadad in concert. Credit: Nurit Manor/Flickr*

Sarit Hadad, an Israeli pop singer of Mizrachi extraction, just released a new single. The song, actually a cover of a Lebanse pop hit of the 1970s, is called “Do You Love Me” and it seems that the answer is, “Some of us do, but a lot of us really, really don’t.” For every fan who praises the song, there is someone who says it’s awful for one or all of the following reasons: it sounds Arab; it sounds Mizrachi; it’s a pathetic rip-off of an old Lebanese pop song and what’s wrong with Hebrew music, anyhow; and, Sarit Hadad is a frecha** who couldn’t sing her way out of a box.

Here she is, performing the song on A Star is Born, the Israeli version of American Idol.


Avi Shoshan, Mizrachi music critic for Ynet, loves the song. He calls it Hadad’s come-back hit.

“It’s a huge hit, and one thing is for sure: it won’t be possible to avoid ‘Do You Love Me.’ There’s a reason it was released at the height of the wedding season: if there’s one thing you can count on, it’s that the number of times this song is played at private parties over the summer will lock Hadad in as one of the highest-earning singers in this country. “

This is what some of the naysayers have to say in the talkbacks:

#54. Israel has become an Arab state

All that’s left is for Ahmed Tibi to become prime minister and Sheikh Raed Salah to be the Chief of Staff. At the parade to celebrate the revolution, Sarit Hadad will sing her Arab song to them.

#51. Now the Mizrachi population will sing this song and think it knows English.

And then there’s this one, which is interesting for what it doesn’t say about how Arabs are regarded in Israel:

#53. Let’s be honest

It’s time to come out and say it: Israeli Mizrachi music is really Arab music. And “Arab” is not an insult, heaven forbid! It’s just a nationality that is characterized by a language, a culture and an easily identifiable taste in music. Therefore, Sarit Hadad is an Arab singer who sings in Hebrew. Sababa.

These days, Mizrachi music is often called ‘Mediterranean’ (In Hebrew, Yam Tichonit). It’s mostly ripped off from old Greek songs, with the lyrics translated into Hebrew and sung in a Mizrachi accent (with a glottal ‘ayin’ and an aspirated ‘het’). Quite a few Mizrachi singers, like Eyal Golan, have had crossover pop hits in the Mediterranean style, but they really don’t sound at all like the pop music you hear on the radio in Lebanon, Syria or Jordan.

Back in the 1980s, when I moved to Israel for the first time, Mizrachi music was very Arab. For years the Israel Broadcast Authority refused to play Mizrachi pop on the radio; instead, fans bought low-quality cassette recordings that were sold cheaply at makeshift stands around the central bus station. This started to change in the 1980s, when the IBA introduced Mizrachi music programs to the radio (and sometimes to television), thus bringing singers like Haim Moshe and Zohar Argov to a wider audience. Ami Kaufman wrote a post about his memory of belting out Haim Moshe’s 1983 hit song, the Arabic-language hit ‘Linda, Linda,’ while hanging out with friends in the Carmel Forest. Reading that post reminded me vividly of the first time I sang that song aloud.

‘Twas the summer of ’84. I was studying Hebrew at the university during the day; by night I waited tables with supreme ineptitude at a restaurant that was owned by a couple of newly immigrated American Jews who lived in a West Bank settlement. They were bearded, covered their heads with enormous crocheted skullcaps and had pistols stuck in their belts at all times. The Palestinian guys who worked in the kitchen often corrected their Hebrew.

At night, after we’d cleaned up and closed the place, the owners would drive us all home in their van. First they’d drop off the Palestinians in various East Jerusalem neighbourhoods, and then they’d take the student workers (like me) back to our dormitories on Mt. Scopus. As we sat squashed shoulder-to-shoulder in the back seat of the van, the Palestinian workers called out to their employer, “Yaakov, put on some Haim Moshe!” Surprisingly eager to oblige, Yaakov would shove a grubby cassette into the player and turn up the volume. Thus we drove through the badly-lit streets of East Jerusalem, bumping over the potholes and swerving to avoid stray cats as we belted out the Arabic lyrics to the Israeli smash-hit single, “Linda, Linda.” According to Haim Moshe’s Wikipedia entry, there were rumours of Linda, Linda being a hit in Syria that same summer.

The original version of “Do You Love Me” was composed and performed in 1978 by the Bendaly Family, who seem to be a Lebanese version of the Partridge Family. Whereas Hadad sings her cover in Hebrew and English, the Bendalys sing theirs in Arabic and English.

I discovered the whole controversy over Hadad’s cover of “Do You Love Me” via this essay on HaOkets (The Sting), an Israeli group blog. The author of the piece, Maya Wallenstein, summarizes the controversy and puts it into the context of an Israeli society that is still dominated by Ashkenazi culture and characterized by dislike, suspicion and ignorance of both Mizrachi and Arab culture.

Here’s a translation of the last two paragraphs of Wallenstein’s piece:

Around the same time that Hadad’s single was released, a charming clip for a song by a Lebanese group called Mashrou’ Leila was circulating around the social media world of the Israeli left. The popularization of the clip amongst Israeli leftists was of course an act of opposition to Israel’s aggressive attitude toward its northern neighbour, and a subversive message of support for peace and reconciliation between the two states. The song is pleasant listening; perhaps too pleasant in this context. The melody is completely western, the substance is western (young people, disappointment in love, highways) and lighthearted. It’s “Mizrachi-ness” is expressed only in the octave-scaling violins.

There is something very easy to digest about this Lebanese song, which is actually very “Paris.” In that sense Hadad’s song is more subversive, because playing it makes people a bit uncomfortable; it is irritating to the ear, it causes a headache – all the things that Sabras (native-born Israelis) feel when they hear the sound of music that is “too Arab” on their radio.

I’m a bit puzzled by the use of ‘sabra’ and ‘Ashkenazi’ as interchangeable terms, given that the bulk of Mizrachim immigrated to Israel in the 1950s and now have native-born grandchildren. And I’m a bit surprised at Ms. Wallenstein’s surprise at discovering that Lebanese pop music is influenced by Europe in our globalized world. And, actually, the first person in Israel to post the Mashrou’ Leila clip on Facebook was a foreign correspondent based in Jerusalem who has family connections in the Middle East and friends in Beirut. She has a lot of Israeli Facebook friends – mostly journalists – and they (we) liked the clip and shared it simply because it’s good music and the clip is quirky and hip. It seems kind of sad that sharing a song about love is described as a subversive act – even if subversive is meant in a positive sense. But then again, this is a region where states nearly go to war over the pruning of a tree.

*Link to photo source.

*Derogatory term used by Ashkenazim to describe women, usually Mizrachi women, who dress gaudily and speak vulgarly.

Cross-posted to +972 Magazine.

Haaretz reporter assaulted by IDF soldiers


Credit: Emil Salman

The man in the choke-hold is Chaim Levinson, Haaretz’s correspondent for issues related to West Bank Jewish settlements. Soldiers assaulted him and confiscated his mobile phone on August 10, while he was covering a march of right-wing activists on their way to establish another illegal outpost at the site of an ancient synagogue near Jericho. According to photographer Emil Salman, the soldiers assaulted Levinson because he was

…grabbing his own phone from the hands of an officer who took it in order to delete photos of himself. Needless to say, he had no right to take the phone, or delete the photos, even if he didn’t like it so much.
And Chaim only took his photo after he wouldn’t identify himself properly.

Salman adds:

the armed forces’ (including all security personnel, police, mall guards) attitude towards the press is steadily detiriorating and is surely following the footsteps of darker, less “Western” regimes.
We are targeted on a daily basis, our press card is a scarlet letter that I personally try to hide, our cameras are police evidence, our profession a source of scorn and ridicule, and in many ways we are less privileged than an ordinary citizen. At any point of friction between civilians and security, the press are targeted first, denied access, pushed to the ground, constantly threatened and abused verbally.

Salman’s photo illustrates a little-reported, but widespread phenomenon of media censorship in the Wild West Bank, where democratic laws and values are rarely applied and the IDF makes up policy as it goes along. The army ignores not only Israeli Supreme Court rulings, but even its own policy regarding the use of live ammunition and tear gas canisters for crowd control. Reporters Without Borders regularly publishes press releases deploring the IDF’s treatment of Palestinian journalists, who seem to have no rights at all: they are beaten, shot at and arrested while doing their jobs; and their cameras are often damaged or confiscated.

Chaim Levinson’s case made Ynet, Israel’s most widely-read news-source, in both Hebrew and English. It doesn’t get any more mainstream than Ynet – and there’s even a video clip showing Levinson being assaulted. But if reporters get beaten up by soldiers all the time in the West Bank, how come this story made the news in Israel?

You probably know where I’m going with this one:

1) The demonstrators were right-wing – settlers, to be precise – and for a change they were actually arrested for breaking the law. This is a rare occurrence.

2) The reporter is a Jewish Israeli. Ashkenazi, even! True, he works for a left-wing newspaper, but he is not a settler basher. Some say he is a bit too sympathetic to the settlers, and that he uses adjectives which betray a bias against human rights NGOs that work on behalf of Palestinians.

These days, it is very difficult to sell a story about IDF lawlessness in the West Bank. In the West, attention has turned to Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq. You can see this in the fact that so many former Jerusalem bureau chiefs were transferred to Kabul and Islamabad, from whence they cover the entire Middle East (budget cuts). The story of Israel-Palestine is stuck on a loop, and editors are bored with oppressed Palestinians, undisciplined IDF soldiers and violent, lawless settlers. For most Israelis, the occupation is just ‘background noise,’ as one friend described it.

Perhaps that is why no-one notices that press freedom is being steadily eroded in Israel – because the story is not being covered by the western media, or even by the mainstream Israeli media. Few people seem to care about the issue.

The next time you see a soldier or border police officer in the West Bank whose name is not displayed clearly on his uniform, try asking him why he’s violating regulations by hiding his identity. If you ask nicely, he’ll probably ignore you. But if, like Chaim Levinson, you photograph him and threaten to report him for violating regulations, you might be assaulted, have your phone confiscated and even be arrested.

Nemesis of free press is finally on his way out

The following is my translation of a piece that was published yesterday on Walla!, a popular Israeli news and information site.

Auspicious appointments

By Emily Grunzweig
22 July 2010

The Office of the Civil Service issued an external tender for the position of director of the Government Press Office (GPO). Danny Seaman, who has been director of the office for the last 10 years, declared his candidacy for an internal tender that was issued in March, but the committee decided against extending his tenure.

The responsibilities of the GPO, which is part of the Prime Minister’s Office, include coordination between the government’s communication offices and the international media based in Israel. Over the years that Seaman headed the GPO, several complaints were made regarding his dealings with the foreign media. In 2007 the Office of the Civil Service opened an investigation into these complaints, which included accusations that Seaman behaved in an inappropriate manner, and that he issued press credentials inequitably, circumventing GPO regulations.

Information Minister Yuli Edelstein gave the following response: “Mr. Danny Seaman served for a number of years as the acting head of the GPO. As per the orders of the Office of the Civil Service, an internal tender for the position was issued. Mr. Seaman put himself forward as a candidate, but the committee declined to select him. Given the importance of the position and the fact that it was unfilled, we issued an external tender in coordination with the Office of the Civil Service.

Danny Seaman’s long history of ‘inappropriate behaviour’ includes the following incidents:

Violently shoving and pushing a female photojournalist while she was covering the Pope’s visit (video clip here).

Attempting to predicate the issuing of press credential on the political views of the applicant. Seaman was complicit in denying renewed press credentials to 60 foreign journalists in a single year – thereby turning veteran, respected journalists who had lived in Israel for years into illegal aliens.

When the work visa of German bureau chief Joerg Bremer of the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,  who had been in Jerusalem for 15 years, was suddenly not renewed, he took the matter to the highest levels, involving the German foreign ministry.  Seaman’s response was to tell a Haaretz reporter that the bureau chief is a “piece of shit” that he’d like to “screw over” (actually, Seaman said he wanted to “fuck over” the reporter, but that bit of colourful language didn’t get past the editor).

Refusing to renew the press credentials of Palestinian cameramen, producers and photographers who had worked for the foreign media for decades, thus destroying their careers and livelihoods.

Refusing to renew the press credentials of veteran reporters of Middle Eastern extraction. According to Reporters Without Borders, this led to a Reuters cameraman and a reporter for Abu Dhabi TV being deported under humiliating circumstances.

Telling New York Times bureau chief Ethan Bronner that he (Seaman) did not want foreign reporters covering Gaza because “Any journalist who enters Gaza becomes a fig leaf and front for the Hamas terror organization…”

Attempting to predicate press credentials on having the applicant journalist investigated by the Shin Bet.

Comparing the BBC to “the worst of Nazi propaganda.”

Sending out an email to the entire foreign press corps, shortly before the May 31 Gaza flotilla incident, in which he sarcastically recommended the cream of spinach soup at Roots, a restaurant in Gaza (this was apparently meant to imply that Gaza, where 80 percent of the population lives on UNRWA aid, is not really in such bad shape; and that the media is exaggerating the gravity of the situation there).

Below is the (slightly edited) text of a letter I sent in 2006 to the head of the civil service, following my own experience with Danny Seaman.

October 29, 2006

To:
Shmuel Hollander
Office of the Civil Service
39 Kaplan Street
Hakirya
Jerusalem 91919

Dear Mr. Hollander,

Re: Danny Seaman, director of the Government Press Office

I am writing to lodge a complaint against Mr. Danny Seaman, director of the Government Press Office, and his assistant Sharon Gorbagi. On the afternoon of 28 September 2006 I went to the GPO office for what was supposed to be a routine renewal of my press card. Instead I was dragged into a shocking confrontation that included abusive language and threats directed against me by Mr. Seaman. Ms. Gorbagi witnessed most of this incident; she was extremely rude to me, and she also supported Mr. Seaman’s threats against me. After giving the matter a great deal of thought, I have decided to make this incident a matter of public record because I think it is very grave.

Since we are both native English speakers, the conversation between Mr. Seaman and me took place in English. He used foul language that is considered offensive in polite discourse – and completely unacceptable coming from a civil servant. I have never in my life, in all my travels around the world, been addressed by a civil servant in such an abusive manner.

When I asked Mr. Seaman why he was speaking to me in this manner, he responded by threatening to initiate a Shin Bet investigation of me. When I asked why he would do such a thing, he gave two reasons: 1) he was enjoying himself (he repeated several times, while smiling, that he was enjoying himself); and 2) I was asking too many questions and he did not allow questions. He then added that he would make sure the Shin Bet investigation took the maximum length of time possible, and that even when he received their approval of my application for a press card he would deny it and force me to re-submit the paperwork. When I asked him why he was doing this, he told me that he did not have to explain himself, and that every time I asked a question, he would reject my application again. Then he added, “You will be without a press card for at least six months.”

In response to my request to speak to his boss, Mr. Seaman said, “I do not have a boss. I am not accountable to anyone. I make all the rules. And just the fact that you have asked me this question means you will never receive a GPO card again.” Shortly after that, I left his office and returned to Tel Aviv.

During subsequent conversations with colleagues who work for various Israeli media, I was warned several times that if I were to lodge an official complaint against Danny Seaman I would risk ruining my career as a journalist in Israel. I was completely shocked to discover that friends who are experienced and well-respected Israeli journalists were so afraid of Mr. Seaman that they were unwilling to make an official complaint against him. Several of my colleagues reported having experienced or witnessed similar confrontations with Mr. Seaman. They all said that my only option was to write a letter of apology (one friend told me I should “crawl”). The consensus opinion is that Mr. Seaman is a civil servant who has become corrupted and sadistic by his power and by the fact that he does indeed seem to be unaccountable.

I have decided to submit an official complaint not only because I need a press card for professional reasons, but also because I am deeply concerned about the long-term damage Danny Seaman is doing. Every foreign journalist in Israel must deal with Mr. Seaman; and I have heard many terrible stories from various foreign correspondents about their dealings with him – confrontations that included threats, foul language and abusive treatment. I am also deeply concerned that a civil servant, whose salary is paid with tax funds, feels that he can abuse Israeli citizens with impunity.

Sincerely yours,

Lisa Goldman

One month after I sent that letter, I was invited to give  a detailed deposition to an attorney at the Office of the Civil Service. Another year passed before I was informed, in November 2007, that the legal department had decided to issue Seaman with an official censure.

After asking – in despair and anger – what it takes to get fired in this country, I asked the attorney at the Office of the Civil Service how the censure would affect Seaman. He answered that when (or if) a tender were issued for the position of GPO manager, a position to which Seaman was appointed ‘temporarily’ in 2000, the censure in his file would make him an unsuitable candidate.

Four years later, the tender was finally issued. And, as the attorney at the Office of the Civil Service said, Seaman was indeed rejected as a suitable candidate. The wheels of justice turn exceedingly slow…

My only wish for Danny Seaman is that he should be treated for the rest of his life exactly as he treated others during his tenure at the GPO.

Move to Gaza, where the living is easy

According to the Israeli government, life in Gaza is pretty luxurious. On the same morning that the air force bombed Gaza, wounding 22 people (who were probably all Hamas voters, which means they totally deserved whatever happened to them), the army, the Government Press Office (GPO) and the Foreign Ministry launched a three-pronged, near-simultaneous propaganda attack.

First, the Foreign Ministry sent out an email to the foreign press with a link to a Maan News report about the opening of Gaza’s first Olympic-sized pool.

The implicit message being, of course, that if they can afford to build a whole Olympic-sized pool for 1.5 million people, things couldn’t be that bad in Gaza.

In the same mail, the FM included a photo of a market in Gaza. See? There’s no humanitarian crisis in Gaza! Note to the Foreign Ministry: true, there is no humanitarian crisis. But that is not because COGAT (the Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, a branch of the Ministry of Defense) allows sufficient aid to come in through Erez and Kerem Shalom Crossings. The goods in the photo below were smuggled in through the tunnels from Egypt.

Then Colonel Levy,  head of the Gaza section of COGAT, called a press conference and announced that the Free Gaza Flotilla, a blockade-busting ship of international activists currently sailing from Turkey to Gaza with a storage hold full of supplies that Israel won’t allow into Gaza, is an unnecessary provocation. Gazans don’t need the aid, Col. Levy told the assembled reporters.

“I don’t see the need for any ship with these materials. We allow these materials into Gaza,” Colonel Moshe Levy told reporters at the Kerem Shalom crossing in reference to the 10,000 tonnes of building materials and other supplies the activists say are aboard a flotilla headed towards Gaza.

“The sail is a provocative act that is unnecessary in light of the figures, which indicate that the humanitarian situation in Gaza is good and stable,” said Levy, who heads the Gaza coordination and liaison office.

In fact, as Israeli NGO Gisha has documented, Israel does not allow in any of those items Col. Levy claimed were regularly sent into the besieged territory. Gaza now has a parallel economy, with tunnel owners employing 30,000 workers and paying official taxes imposed by Hamas. Around 4,200 items are smuggled in through the tunnels – from cattle and cars to sanitary napkins and clothes – while COGAT allows only a few dozen items.

The items forbidden by Israel include coriander, notebooks, jam, chocolate and children’s toys. OCHA has more information in its detailed reports about USAid goods that COGAT prevented from being transferred into Gaza. These include blankets, white tehina, tomato paste and recreational sports equipment for children. COGAT also forbade Gazan strawberry farmers from exporting their crops this year. And, of course, anyone who comes within 700 meters of the security fence gets shot at, so if you’re a farmer with fields near within half-a-kilometer of the Green Line, you’ve got a problem.

And then, the piece de resistance: The Government Press Office, headed by one Danny Seaman, sent out the following email to all the foreign correspondents on its mailing list.


Danny Seaman

GPO Recommended Restaurant in Gaza

In anticipation of foreign correspondents traveling to Gaza to cover reports of alleged humanitarian difficulties in the Hamas run territory, and as part of efforts to facilitate the work of journalists in the region, the Government Press Office is pleased to bring to your attention the attached menu and information for the Roots Club and Restaurant in Gaza.

We have been told the beef stroganoff and cream of spinach soup are highly recommended.  You may wish to enquire of a possible discount upon presentation of a valid press card.

There is also the possibility of an enjoyable evening on the Greens Terrace Garden Cafe, which serves “eclectic food and fresh cocktails”.

A video of the club’s luxurious facilities may be viewed here.

Booking in advance is advisable, and as the website states, the Roots Club is fully equipped for hospitality and corporate events.

Correspondents may also wish to enjoy a swim at the new Olympic size swimming pool as reported in the Palestinian media to have been opened last week.

The email includes the following video clip, showing the opening of the restaurant. Looks lovely, yes? You can see gorgeous, unveiled women wearing pantsuits. And there’s PA President Mahmoud Abbas and former Gaza strongman Mohamed Dahlan… Wait. They were both kicked out of Gaza by Hamas in 2007, which makes you wonder when that video was shot. So you call an acquaintance in Gaza and you ask him, and he says the grand opening was in 2005, which is two years before Israel imposed its blockade. Hmmmm…..

So anyway, it’s true that foreign correspondents with expense accounts can afford to eat beef stroganoff made from tunnel-smuggled ingredients at the Roots Club. So can a tiny percentage of Gazans who still have money – reporters and fixers who work for the international press, for example. But, given that 80 percent of Gazans live off international aid, and 1.1 million (out of 1.5 million) live with “food insecurity,” I’m guessing that not many can afford the beef stroganoff or the cream of spinach soup at the Roots Club.

The thing is, I don’t really understand the government’s message. It’s confusing!  On the one hand they’re telling us that things are not that bad in Gaza (which could be true if your measure for comparison is Zimbabwe or Congo, I suppose), even though they neglect to tell us that the smuggling tunnels are pretty much all that’s standing between COGAT and a full-blown humanitarian crisis. But on the other hand, they tell us that the siege is imposed in order to make the situation so bad that Hamas will be forced to surrender power and release Gilad Shalit. But if the situation is really as wonderful as the government claims, then how do they expect to bring Hamas to its knees?

I mean, if Gaza were really as lovely as the government would have us believe (except for the bombings, of course), then perhaps it would not be so upsetting to read comments on my blog that advise me to go live there. If the government would let me into Gaza, of course. Which they wouldn’t. Because Israelis are not allowed into Gaza. Which is why we really have no way of knowing if the food at Roots is any good.

Rally for Israeli children in Tel Aviv

They were born in Israel. They are native Hebrew speakers who were educated in the Israeli public school system. But because they are the offspring of non-Jewish migrant workers, around 1,200 children stand to be deported to their parents’ native countries – even though they’ve never been there and often do not speak the language.

You can see these children all over south Tel Aviv, playing basketball and football in the parks and walking hand-in-hand with their mothers through the Carmel Market. Many of them attend a school that is called, perhaps a little ironically, Bialik. They speak unaccented Hebrew and they celebrate the Jewish holidays just like all secular Israeli Jewish kids – with school seders, mad Yom Kippur bike rides through car-free streets, wearing fancy dress to school on Purim and singing songs about light and the Maccabees at Chanukah.

Interior Minister Eli Yishai (Shas) wants to deport these children because they are not Jewish.

The organizers of Israeli Children, an NGO that is working to save these Israel-born children of migrant workers, believe that Yishai will sign the final order to deport these children in the coming weeks, when the school year ends, in order to minimize bad publicity from scenes like this:

In a last push to stop Minister Yishai from signing the order to deport the children, a protest demonstration will take place in Tel Aviv tomorrow evening (Tuesday, May 25), at 7.30 pm at the Tel Aviv Museum.

The event will be hosted by: Orly Vilnai and Guy Meroz (investigative reporters who focus on social justice issues).

Performing artists: Dudu Tassa, Shlomo Grunich, Maya Rotman and Keren Pelles

Various MKs from across the political spectrum are also scheduled to speak.

Witness to a demonstration: a Friday in Nabi Salih

On Friday afternoons in Nabi Salih, it starts like this. A few Israeli and foreign activists arrive at the village around noon, gathering at the home of Bassam Tamimi. His door is open, so there is no need to knock. Inside, villagers and visitors socialize, use the washroom and help themselves from the huge spread of homemade food laid out on the kitchen table. Bassam’s children run between the guests’ legs; and Sameeh, a neighbour from Jaffa, picks one of them up and tickles him. The atmosphere is relaxed, jovial and friendly. Most of these people see one another every Friday, under the same circumstances.

Bassam’s mother (or perhaps mother-in-law) sits on one of the chairs, her legs pulled up in a near-squat, observing the visitors through half-blind eyes. She looks like a Palestinian grandmother out of central casting, with her long white veil, embroidered traditional dress, deeply wrinkled face and thin, arthritic hands. I greet her by clasping one of them and muttering something in mangled Arabic. She responds by telling me to eat – a word I understand because the Arabic and Hebrew roots are the same (AKL), and also because that’s what grandmothers tend to do, the world over – urge you to eat.

After we have eaten and drunk our tea, Bassam says, “So, shall we start?”

Village boys and some older men congregate at the top of the village’s main road. Some carry Palestinian flags. They start to walk down the path, clapping their hands and chanting rhythmically. There are a couple of Palestinian news cameramen, looking prepared for trouble with their gas masks, flack vests and helmets – and a sprinkling of non-Palestinian freelance photojournalists. Some of them have gas masks, too. The non-Palestinians – maybe 10 Israelis and a handful of Europeans – walk on the sides, observing but not participating. The photojournalists and cameramen walk backwards down the hill as they photograph and film the demonstrators. There are no reporters for the Israeli media.

The goal of the march is to reach the spring across the road, maybe 300 meters away, next to the religious settlement of Halamish, a settlement that was created in the late 1970s on expropriated Nabi Saleh agricultural land. The cluster of stone village houses is divided by a smooth, new blacktop road from the rows of identical white settlement houses. The villagers continued, for years after Halamish’s cookie-cutter houses were erected, to cultivate the fields next to the settlement. Until one day, a few months ago, the settlers decided to expropriate the spring that is located on that land. Gideon Levy explains that the settlers say they want to use the spring for a spa. They planted an Israeli flag next to it, then used threats of violence to prevent the Nabi Saleh villagers from cultivating the farmland upon which the spring was located.


Halamish, as seen from Nabi Salih

For the army, the goal is not to mediate or to serve justice. The goal is to keep things quiet. So, rather than adjudicating between the residents of Halamish and Nabi Saleh – e.g., by telling the settlers to take their flag away from the spring and stop preventing the villagers from farming their land – the army declared the area a closed military zone. They did not tell the settlers to take down the flag or to stop threatening the Palestinians who wanted to continue cultivating their fields. Instead, the army prevented the Nabi Saleh farmers from reaching their land, because that would make the settlers angry, and when the settlers get angry they get violent, and if there was violence the peace would be disturbed. That is why, on Friday afternoons for the past five months, the villagers have been marching toward the spring. And that is why, each Friday afternoon, the army prevents them from doing so. This is the story of how the army stops the villagers from reaching the spring.

Two minutes into the demonstration, with a violent abruptness that never fails to shock, a caravan of noisy armoured vehicles roars into the village. The back doors slam open even before the vehicles screech to a halt. Border police, dressed in full riot gear, leap out of the back, race forward and shoot tear gas in loud volleys. They also lob sound grenades that explode upon impact with a fearsome bang that makes the village sound like a battlefield.

The demonstrators are still well inside their own village. They are not carrying any weapons – not even stones. The group include small children; one has Down’s Syndrome. Everyone scatters to get away from the tear gas. I am standing a few meters away, behind a stone wall that surrounds a private house, which has become a target for several tear gas canisters all at once. The familiar bitter taste and prickling sinuses remind of how disgusting tear gas is; and I back away to avoid getting a full dose from the next barrage. But too late. Pop! Pop! Pop! Ping! One of the canisters lands right near me and I’m groping in my bag for a scarf and a bottle of water.

A young man standing just inside the doorway of the house looks at me and says, in Arabic-accented English, “Get in!”

Inside, a middle-aged woman wearing a hijab and a long dress sits nervously on a couch. Her son and daughter, maybe 5 and 7 years old, sit next to her, in silence. The boy is playing a game on his mobile phone, while the girl just sits on her pink plastic chair, looking occasionally at her mother for reassurance. The mother smiles at me and indicates that I should sit down. She brings me a glass of orange juice on a tray, and half an onion to hold up to my nose as an antidote to the tear gas. Every few minutes she gets up and turns on the fan to disperse the gas, which seeps in through the cracks around the windows and doors, but that doesn’t always help.

At one point her son stands up abruptly, goes wordlessly into the kitchen and fetches another onion, slices it in half and returns to the couch, holding half for himself and the other half for his little sister. To distract them, I take their photos and show them their images. The boy smiles a little, but then another volley of tear gas lands outside their front door and he stops smiling.

Outside, the local boys were throwing rocks at the border police, who continued to fire tear gas. Many had wrapped scarves around their faces, partly to ward off the tear gas and partly to disguise their identity so that Israeli security forces, which videotape the demonstrations, would not be able to target them for arrest during the night-time raids. The IDF raids the village several times a week, arresting teenage stone throwers and keeping them in detention for extended periods.

This is the image that frightens and angers Israelis: a muscular teenage Palestinian, dressed in a T-shirt and jeans, a keffiyeh wrapped around his face and a rock or a slingshot in his hand. It’s a classic shot that has appeared on the front page of Israeli newspapers on many occasions.

And there, at the bottom of the road, is the image that frightens and angers Palestinians: armed soldiers inside their village, eager for action and not very disciplined, shooting tear gas, throwing sound grenades and sometimes adding some plastic or rubber bullets and skunk gas as well.

The Palestinians define these demonstrations as non-violent because they don’t throw stones unless the army shoots first. There are those who argue that demonstrators cannot call themselves non-violent if they are throwing stones – even if the targets are wearing helmets and carrying riot shields. And then there is the argument that if the villagers don’t throw stones in response to the tear gas, then there will be no media coverage at all.

Well, I don’t know. Perhaps if the villagers had all sat down on the road and just allowed themselves to be asphyxiated by tear gas or dragged away to jail, there would have been some media coverage. Or perhaps not. Then again, the stone throwers did not hurt anybody. But on the other hand, the images coming out of that demo – the classic ‘scary Palestinian’ shots of boys with keffiyeh-covered faces throwing stones – are the ones that will make the biggest impact on Israelis. Once they see that image, which elicits such primordial responses of fear, they are highly unlikely to ask what the villagers were protesting, or why the army is breaking up a demonstration that is taking place inside the village and not harming anyone, and whether or not the Palestinians have the right to demonstrate – and if not, why not?

Anyway, things quieted down for a few minutes so I left the home in which I’d taken shelter and started walking toward the olive grove at the foot of the road. But then there was another round of tear gas. A voice from the roof above my head said in English, “Hello! Come up here. You can see better.”

So I entered the house and walked upstairs, where teenage Zeynab and her sisters, who seemed to range in age from 10-14, had an excellent view of the soldiers and the local rock throwers, three of whom were crouching behind a wall. Cat-and-mouse.


The view from Zeynab’s roof.


Tear gas outside the house.

Zeynab said quietly, “Something so evil is happening here.” After a few minutes she gestured toward the local boys and called out to them in Arabic, pointing toward the soldiers who were waiting below, in the olive grove. I looked down and saw sunlight glinting on the barrel of a tear gas dispenser as it was aimed directly at us on the roof. “Ya banaat!” I shouted, but there was no way to beat the tear gas. It exploded on the roof. We rushed down the stairs, with the smaller girls retching loudly. One of them slammed the door to the bathroom and sounded as though she were throwing up, while another called out that their living room window had been shattered by the impact. The younger brothers raced into the kitchen, sliced onions and passed them out to all of us. A boy who looked about 8 years old warned me to stop rubbing my eyes, because I would just spread the tear gas deeper.

We sat on cushions in the living room, wiping the mucus and tears with tissues and laughing a little as we recovered. After awhile there was a lull outside, so I said goodbye and left, after photographing one of the girls in front of the shattered living room window. She giggled as she wrapped her brother’s scarf around her face and posed.

For the rest of the afternoon I crouched under trees or in the shade of low stone walls, watching from various locations, together with the Israeli and foreign observers, as the village boys and the Israeli boys in uniform played the tear gas versus stones game. Everyone had a role to play, and it did not look as though this demonstration was going to change anything. There were odd scenes, like the car decorated for a wedding that drove up a rock-strewn road, with soldiers at the bottom and rock-throwing teenagers at the top, as both sides held their fire so the bride and groom could pass.

The commanding officer was a lieutenant colonel in the Nahal Brigade. When I addressed him in Hebrew he responded in English. “I can speak any language you want,” he said, as he gave the border police permission to shoot more tear gas. “Do you speak Latin?” No, I answered, I’m afraid not. I stood there with Didi, Philip and a few others – photographers and Israeli observers, mostly. The officer expressed some interest in Philip’s camera at one point.

Didi had served as an officer in the army, and so had a couple of the other Israelis present, so there was this odd relationship of opposition based on politics, and camaraderie based on shared experiences.

From that position, near the soldiers standing at the bottom of the road, it was easy to forget that there were small children two minutes’ walk away, sitting quietly in their homes and breathing tear gas. I wondered how the polyglot officer of an elite combat unit would feel if his children were in those houses, but I didn’t ask him that cliched question. He’d probably tell me that he was sorry for them, but what about the children in Sderot, or something like that. As if Hamas’s launching Qassams at Israel justified the Israeli army’s repression of the villagers in Nabi Saleh. But I did say something else to that officer. “Listen,” I said. “I know you’re not a bad person. But you’re doing something really bad right now. And one day you’ll give testimony to Breaking the Silence. Remember what I said.”

Then we piled into Didi’s car and drove away as he waved farewell to the officer and called out, with heavy irony, “Keep on making the Nahal proud!” As we approached Jerusalem and the much-photographed wall, I looked at the watchtowers and the checkpoints and the high concrete walls surrounding the jail for political prisoners, and said, “Well, at least we know we’re secure.”

The worst company in the world

I won’t have time to write a substantial post for another day or two – and no, for those of you who are wondering, I haven’t forgotten about the photos of Houses from Within – so meanwhile I’m bringing you the trailer for a hilarious Israeli documentary film called The Worst Company in the World. It was screened at DocAviv, but to my regret I couldn’t make the time slots work. I think I’ll have to hit up the publicist for a DVD, though: if the trailer made me laugh as hard as I did (in public), then the film must be worth seeing. Director Regev Contes won the mayor’s award for a young and promising new director at DocAviv.

Synopsis from the DocAviv site: Three divorced middle aged men with glasses work together in a small, failing insurance agency, located in the rented apartment of the owner. Although they are highly intelligent, have a sense of humor, and well educated, they have absolutely no idea about running a business. Their company is losing a good deal of money and is continually on the verge of bankruptcy. The film documents the attempts of the manager’s son, the film’s director, to join this motley crew at the onset of the recession, and save his father’s collapsing firm.

My explanatory addition to the official synopsis:

The film is a humorous, affectionate documentary about a failing insurance company run by the director’s father, Carol Contes, in partnership with his two brothers. The opening titles in Hebrew announce that the film begins December 31, the last day of the year – and the most stressful day of the year for an insurance company. Contes, narrates the director, means “clerk” in Czech. His father is descended from a 200-year dynasty of clerks.The father has a volatile temper, especially when one of his brothers makes his “daily mistake,” but he is also demonstrably affectionate toward his siblings.

If you like the film and/or would like to obtain a copy to screen in your community, you can email director Regev Contes: theworstcompany@gmail.com

UPDATE: Haaretz published a lovely article about the film/interview with the director.

The trailer:

Gaza: three perspectives on the media’s coverage

JORDAN ISRAEL GAZA MIDEAST
Credit: AP

In its May-June issue, the Columbia Journalism Review has published three perspectives on the media’s coverage of Operation Cast Lead, also known as the Gaza War. One of them is by your favourite Israeli blogger (that’d be me).

Taghreed El-Khodary is the Gaza correspondent for the New York Times. Her reporter’s notebook piece is called The Smell of Paradise: under pressure in Gaza.

Taghreed and I spoke jointly at a conference in Norway this past March. Here’s a photo I took of her on the last day in snowy Tonsberg, as we were waiting for our taxis to the airport.

img_2839

J.J. Goldberg is the former editor of The Forward. He compares the British and American media’s coverage of Gaza in his piece, called A Matter of Trust.

(I’ve never met J.J., so I don’t have any photos of him).

My piece is about the Israeli media’s coverage of the war. It is called Covering Gaza from Israel: what Israelis wanted to know about the war. It starts like this:

“During the first week of Israel’s winter military operation in Gaza, a broadcaster for Channel 2, which has the highest rating of Israel’s three television stations, sparked a small firestorm by expressing what was perceived as excessive sympathy for the enemy. Summarizing a report during the evening news, anchorwoman Yonit Levy said, “It’s hard to convince the world that the war is justified when we have one person dead and the Palestinian nation has 350 dead.” Channel 2 was soon inundated with letters of complaint and came under fire online, where somebody set up an Internet petition to have Levy fired. Several of Levy’s colleagues, horrified by what one called a ‘lynch,’ came publicly to her support.

In the end the controversy was short-lived: Levy continues to anchor the Channel 2 news broadcast, which maintains its high ratings, and she remains Israel’s most popular news anchor. But the reaction to her statement is interesting as a demonstration of the solid public support—polled at more than 90 percent—for the twenty-two-day military operation, which finished with around 1,200 to 1,400 Palestinians killed and 11 Israelis, including 3 civilians. It also suggests what kind of wartime coverage the Israeli public wanted from its media.”

Click here to read the rest. You can comment on the CJR site – or, come back here to speak your mind.

DocAviv – fabulous, as always

Sorry for the delay in posting my photos from last week’s Houses from Within. I’ve actually been busy writing an article about it for a magazine (more details once it’s been published).  Since I was busy taking notes I didn’t have time to take many photos. But despair not – it’s all good: I was accompanied by a super-talented photojournalist who took far more shots than the magazine can use. He’s going to send me some of his leftover shots later today; and I’ll post them with commentary later on today or tomorrow.

Meanwhile, yesterday was the final day of DocAviv, the annual week-long documentary film festival. After morning yoga class, I spent the day watching films for free (press pass!). In between screenings, I sat at an outdoor cafe and drank cappuccino while reading the weekend newspapers, enjoying the Saturday peace and the perfect late spring weather. Short version: a perfect Saturday, and the ideal antidote to a very difficult week.

As usual, DocAviv was a fabulous event and very well-attended event, with Israeli and international films competing for several prizes. Also as usual, I did not have time to attend all the screenings I wanted. Of those I did see, three made a very strong impression, for different reasons.

Kimjongilia is a documentary that features interviews with North Koreans who escaped their native country, usually via China, and are now living in South Korea. If anything, the synopsis from the film’s website soft-pedals the horrific tales recounted by the soft-spoken survivors interviewed for this film – stories about 9 year-old children taken to a concentration camp, where they were starved, beaten and worked nearly to death, for example. It is estimated that about 3.5 million North Koreans have died of starvation or in the gulag since the mid-1990s. The film was disturbing, but very well done. It really drives home the point that the world is paying little attention to this horrific human rights catastrophe.

The synopsis:

“KIMJONGILIA, The Flower of Kim Jong Il, is the first film to fully expose the disaster through a tapestry of defectors’stories, North Korean propaganda, and original performance. This feature documentary shows why the defectors fled, describes their hair-raising escapes, and recounts the dangers they face in China, hunted by Chinese as well as North Korean police. These refugees are from every walk of life, from child concentration camp inmates to an elite concert pianist. But their stories all speak of body-and-soul killing repression and paint a picture of a country so far off the rails it defies belief. Ultimately, these humble heroes are inspiring, for despite their suffering, they hold out hope for a better future.”

Kimjongilia trailer:

Defamation, by Israeli documentary director Yoav Shamir.  Shamir made his reputation with Checkpoints, a prize-winning and critically-acclaimed documentary about the IDF checkpoints in the West Bank. This time he investigates anti-Semitism in a provocative film that asks whether anti-Semitism is really a serious problem today, and whether we are perhaps too focused on the past. Shamir answered questions after the screening, which was packed. He said that he intended to provoke a debate rather than offer answers. In answer to questions about two of the controversial figures in the film – Abe Foxman and Norman Finkelstein – he said that he disagreed with some of what they said and agreed with some, that he wasn’t trying to discredit anyone.

Here’s the trailer for Defamation:

After all that serious stuff, I really, really enjoyed Le Cirque: a table in heaven – about the famed New York restaurant (where I once enjoyed a memorable meal; it’s nice to have rich, generous friends). Here’s an excerpt from the synopsis, which you can read in full here:

“LE CIRQUE: A TABLE IN HEAVEN is an intimate family portrait of Le Cirque founder Sirio Maccioni, Egidiana, his wife and confidant of 40 years, and their three sons, to whom he will one day leave his formidable cultural and culinary legacy. While other restaurants have big money and corporations behind them, Sirio says Le Cirque ‘is a family affair and completely independent.’ Oldest son Mario runs Le Cirque, Las Vegas, while Marco, the middle son, and Mauro, the youngest, work in New York. Meanwhile, Egidiana prepares rustic meals in the tiny kitchen of their Manhattan apartment.”

Here’s the trailer for “A Table in Heaven”: